» Articles » PMID: 12237400

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Contributions to Stochasticity in Gene Expression

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2002 Sep 19
PMID 12237400
Citations 598
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gene expression is a stochastic, or "noisy," process. This noise comes about in two ways. The inherent stochasticity of biochemical processes such as transcription and translation generates "intrinsic" noise. In addition, fluctuations in the amounts or states of other cellular components lead indirectly to variation in the expression of a particular gene and thus represent "extrinsic" noise. Here, we show how the total variation in the level of expression of a given gene can be decomposed into its intrinsic and extrinsic components. We demonstrate theoretically that simultaneous measurement of two identical genes per cell enables discrimination of these two types of noise. Analytic expressions for intrinsic noise are given for a model that involves all the major steps in transcription and translation. These expressions give the sensitivity to various parameters, quantify the deviation from Poisson statistics, and provide a way of fitting experiment. Transcription dominates the intrinsic noise when the average number of proteins made per mRNA transcript is greater than approximately 2. Below this number, translational effects also become important. Gene replication and cell division, included in the model, cause protein numbers to tend to a limit cycle. We calculate a general form for the extrinsic noise and illustrate it with the particular case of a single fluctuating extrinsic variable-a repressor protein, which acts on the gene of interest. All results are confirmed by stochastic simulation using plausible parameters for Escherichia coli.

Citing Articles

Controlling noise with self-organized resetting.

Meigel F, Rulands S Commun Phys. 2025; 8(1):63.

PMID: 39949347 PMC: 11813803. DOI: 10.1038/s42005-025-01985-7.


From homogeneity to heterogeneity: Refining stochastic simulations of gene regulation.

Chae S, Shin S, Lee K, Lee S, Kim J Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025; 27:411-422.

PMID: 39906159 PMC: 11791169. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.01.004.


An Entropy-Based Approach to Model Selection with Application to Single-Cell Time-Stamped Snapshot Data.

Stewart W, Jayaprakash C, Das J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39803546 PMC: 11722210. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.03.631247.


Deriving a genetic regulatory network from an optimization principle.

Sokolowski T, Gregor T, Bialek W, Tkacik G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(1):e2402925121.

PMID: 39752518 PMC: 11725783. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2402925121.


Multivariate stochastic modeling for transcriptional dynamics with cell-specific latent time using SDEvelo.

Liao X, Kang L, Peng Y, Chai X, Xie P, Lin C Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10849.

PMID: 39738101 PMC: 11685993. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55146-5.


References
1.
Hasty J, PRADINES J, Dolnik M, Collins J . Noise-based switches and amplifiers for gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(5):2075-80. PMC: 15756. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.040411297. View

2.
McAdams H, Arkin A . It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. Trends Genet. 1999; 15(2):65-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(98)01659-x. View

3.
Kierzek A, Zaim J, Zielenkiewicz P . The effect of transcription and translation initiation frequencies on the stochastic fluctuations in prokaryotic gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2000; 276(11):8165-72. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M006264200. View

4.
Paulsson J, Ehrenberg M . Noise in a minimal regulatory network: plasmid copy number control. Q Rev Biophys. 2001; 34(1):1-59. DOI: 10.1017/s0033583501003663. View

5.
Thattai M, van Oudenaarden A . Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(15):8614-9. PMC: 37484. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.151588598. View