» Articles » PMID: 28069345

Patients' Perspectives on Quality of Life After Burn

Overview
Journal Burns
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Jan 11
PMID 28069345
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The concept quality of life (QOL) refers to both health-related outcomes and one's skills to reach these outcomes, which is not yet incorporated in the burn-related QOL conceptualisation. The aim of this study was to obtain a comprehensive overview of relevant burn-specific domains of QOL from the patient's perspective and to determine its hierarchical structure.

Methods: Concept mapping was used comprising a focus group (n=6), interviews (n=25), and a card-sorting task (n=24) in burn survivors. Participants sorted aspects of QOL based on content similarity after which hierarchical cluster analysis was used to determine the hierarchical structure of burn-related QOL.

Results: Ninety-nine aspects of burn-related QOL were selected from the interviews, written on cards, and sorted. The hierarchical structure of burn-related QOL showed a core distinction between resilience and vulnerability. Resilience comprised the domains positive coping and social sharing. Vulnerability included 5 domains subdivided in 13 subdomains: the psychological domain included trauma-related symptoms, cognitive symptoms, negative emotions, body perception and depressive mood; the economical domain comprised finance and work; the social domain included stigmatisation/invalidation; the physical domain comprised somatic symptoms, scars, and functional limitations; and the intimate/sexual domain comprised the relationship with partner, and anxiety/avoidance in sexual life.

Conclusion: From the patient's perspective, QOL following burns includes a variety of vulnerability and resilience factors, which forms a fresh basis for the development of a screening instrument. Whereas some factors are well known, this study also revealed overlooked problem and resilience areas that could be considered in client-centred clinical practice in order to customize self-management support.

Citing Articles

Resilience and Posttraumatic Growth after Burn: A Review of Barriers, Enablers, and Interventions to Improve Psychological Recovery.

Woolard A, Bullman I, Allahham A, Long T, Milroy H, Wood F Eur Burn J. 2024; 3(1):89-121.

PMID: 39604178 PMC: 11575369. DOI: 10.3390/ebj3010009.


Aspects of Clinical Utility of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List after Burns.

Hofland H, van de Steenoven A, Van Loey N Eur Burn J. 2024; 3(2):320-327.

PMID: 39600002 PMC: 11575359. DOI: 10.3390/ebj3020027.


Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life of Adult Patients with Intermediate Burns: The Added Value of an Itching and Cognition Item for the EQ-5D: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Dijkshoorn J, Haagsma J, van der Vlies C, Hop M, van Baar M, Spronk I Eur Burn J. 2024; 3(2):264-277.

PMID: 39599998 PMC: 11575368. DOI: 10.3390/ebj3020023.


Development and Testing of the Aftercare Problem List, a Burn Aftercare Screening Instrument.

Van Loey N, Boersma-van Dam E, Boekelaar A, van de Steenoven A, de Jong A, Hofland H Eur Burn J. 2024; 5(2):90-103.

PMID: 39599981 PMC: 11545676. DOI: 10.3390/ebj5020008.


Qualitative Descriptive Research Investigating Burn Survivors' Perspectives on Quality of Care Aspects.

Thambithurai R, van Dammen L, van Baar M, Wanders H, Weel-Koenders A, Haanstra T Eur Burn J. 2024; 5(3):215-227.

PMID: 39599946 PMC: 11545247. DOI: 10.3390/ebj5030021.