Patients' Perspectives on Quality of Life After Burn
Affiliations
Background: The concept quality of life (QOL) refers to both health-related outcomes and one's skills to reach these outcomes, which is not yet incorporated in the burn-related QOL conceptualisation. The aim of this study was to obtain a comprehensive overview of relevant burn-specific domains of QOL from the patient's perspective and to determine its hierarchical structure.
Methods: Concept mapping was used comprising a focus group (n=6), interviews (n=25), and a card-sorting task (n=24) in burn survivors. Participants sorted aspects of QOL based on content similarity after which hierarchical cluster analysis was used to determine the hierarchical structure of burn-related QOL.
Results: Ninety-nine aspects of burn-related QOL were selected from the interviews, written on cards, and sorted. The hierarchical structure of burn-related QOL showed a core distinction between resilience and vulnerability. Resilience comprised the domains positive coping and social sharing. Vulnerability included 5 domains subdivided in 13 subdomains: the psychological domain included trauma-related symptoms, cognitive symptoms, negative emotions, body perception and depressive mood; the economical domain comprised finance and work; the social domain included stigmatisation/invalidation; the physical domain comprised somatic symptoms, scars, and functional limitations; and the intimate/sexual domain comprised the relationship with partner, and anxiety/avoidance in sexual life.
Conclusion: From the patient's perspective, QOL following burns includes a variety of vulnerability and resilience factors, which forms a fresh basis for the development of a screening instrument. Whereas some factors are well known, this study also revealed overlooked problem and resilience areas that could be considered in client-centred clinical practice in order to customize self-management support.
Woolard A, Bullman I, Allahham A, Long T, Milroy H, Wood F Eur Burn J. 2024; 3(1):89-121.
PMID: 39604178 PMC: 11575369. DOI: 10.3390/ebj3010009.
Aspects of Clinical Utility of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List after Burns.
Hofland H, van de Steenoven A, Van Loey N Eur Burn J. 2024; 3(2):320-327.
PMID: 39600002 PMC: 11575359. DOI: 10.3390/ebj3020027.
Dijkshoorn J, Haagsma J, van der Vlies C, Hop M, van Baar M, Spronk I Eur Burn J. 2024; 3(2):264-277.
PMID: 39599998 PMC: 11575368. DOI: 10.3390/ebj3020023.
Development and Testing of the Aftercare Problem List, a Burn Aftercare Screening Instrument.
Van Loey N, Boersma-van Dam E, Boekelaar A, van de Steenoven A, de Jong A, Hofland H Eur Burn J. 2024; 5(2):90-103.
PMID: 39599981 PMC: 11545676. DOI: 10.3390/ebj5020008.
Thambithurai R, van Dammen L, van Baar M, Wanders H, Weel-Koenders A, Haanstra T Eur Burn J. 2024; 5(3):215-227.
PMID: 39599946 PMC: 11545247. DOI: 10.3390/ebj5030021.