» Articles » PMID: 28049135

Design of RNAs: Comparing Programs for Inverse RNA Folding

Overview
Journal Brief Bioinform
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Jan 4
PMID 28049135
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computational programs for predicting RNA sequences with desired folding properties have been extensively developed and expanded in the past several years. Given a secondary structure, these programs aim to predict sequences that fold into a target minimum free energy secondary structure, while considering various constraints. This procedure is called inverse RNA folding. Inverse RNA folding has been traditionally used to design optimized RNAs with favorable properties, an application that is expected to grow considerably in the future in light of advances in the expanding new fields of synthetic biology and RNA nanostructures. Moreover, it was recently demonstrated that inverse RNA folding can successfully be used as a valuable preprocessing step in computational detection of novel noncoding RNAs. This review describes the most popular freeware programs that have been developed for such purposes, starting from RNAinverse that was devised when formulating the inverse RNA folding problem. The most recently published ones that consider RNA secondary structure as input are antaRNA, RNAiFold and incaRNAfbinv, each having different features that could be beneficial to specific biological problems in practice. The various programs also use distinct approaches, ranging from ant colony optimization to constraint programming, in addition to adaptive walk, simulated annealing and Boltzmann sampling. This review compares between the various programs and provides a simple description of the various possibilities that would benefit practitioners in selecting the most suitable program. It is geared for specific tasks requiring RNA design based on input secondary structure, with an outlook toward the future of RNA design programs.

Citing Articles

DesiRNA: structure-based design of RNA sequences with a replica exchange Monte Carlo approach.

Wirecki T, Lach G, Badepally N, Moafinejad S, Jaryani F, Klaudel G Nucleic Acids Res. 2025; 53(2).

PMID: 39831304 PMC: 11744100. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1306.


R3Design: deep tertiary structure-based RNA sequence design and beyond.

Tan C, Zhang Y, Gao Z, Cao H, Li S, Ma S Brief Bioinform. 2024; 26(1).

PMID: 39737572 PMC: 11685104. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae682.


GenerRNA: A generative pre-trained language model for de novo RNA design.

Zhao Y, Oono K, Takizawa H, Kotera M PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0310814.

PMID: 39352899 PMC: 11444397. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310814.


A Computational Approach for Designing Synthetic Riboswitches for Next-Generation RNA Therapeutics.

Mukherjee S, Mukherjee S, Barash D Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2847:193-204.

PMID: 39312145 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4079-1_13.


Toward Increasing the Credibility of RNA Design.

Antczak M, Szachniuk M Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2847:137-151.

PMID: 39312141 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4079-1_9.


References
1.
Giegerich R, Voss B, Rehmsmeier M . Abstract shapes of RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32(16):4843-51. PMC: 519098. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh779. View

2.
Hofacker I . Vienna RNA secondary structure server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(13):3429-31. PMC: 169005. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg599. View

3.
Isaacs F, Dwyer D, Collins J . RNA synthetic biology. Nat Biotechnol. 2006; 24(5):545-54. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1208. View

4.
Dotu I, Lozano G, Clote P, Martinez-Salas E . Using RNA inverse folding to identify IRES-like structural subdomains. RNA Biol. 2013; 10(12):1842-52. PMC: 3917987. DOI: 10.4161/rna.26994. View

5.
Terai G, Kamegai S, Asai K . CDSfold: an algorithm for designing a protein-coding sequence with the most stable secondary structure. Bioinformatics. 2015; 32(6):828-34. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv678. View