» Articles » PMID: 27862666

Filling the Void-enriching the Feature Space of Successful Stopping

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2016 Nov 19
PMID 27862666
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to inhibit behavior is crucial for adaptation in a fast changing environment and is commonly studied with the stop signal task. Current EEG research mainly focuses on the N200 and P300 ERPs and corresponding activity in the theta and delta frequency range, thereby leaving us with a limited understanding of the mechanisms of response inhibition. Here, 15 functional networks were estimated from time-frequency transformed EEG recorded during processing of a visual stop signal task. Cortical sources underlying these functional networks were reconstructed, and a total of 45 features, each representing spectrally and temporally coherent activity, were extracted to train a classifier to differentiate between go and stop trials. A classification accuracy of 85.55% for go and 83.85% for stop trials was achieved. Features capturing fronto-central delta- and theta activity, parieto-occipital alpha, fronto-central as well as right frontal beta activity were highly discriminating between trial-types. However, only a single network, comprising a feature defined by oscillatory activity below 12 Hz, was associated with a generator in the opercular region of the right inferior frontal cortex and showed the expected associations with behavioral inhibition performance. This study pioneers by providing a detailed ranking of neural features regarding their information content for stop and go differentiation at the single-trial level, and may further be the first to identify a scalp EEG marker of the inhibitory control network. This analysis allows for the characterization of the temporal dynamics of response inhibition by matching electrophysiological phenomena to cortical generators and behavioral inhibition performance. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1333-1346, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive Analysis of Event-Related Potentials of Response Inhibition: The Role of Negative Urgency and Compulsivity.

Wullhorst V, Wullhorst R, Overmeyer R, Endrass T Psychophysiology. 2025; 62(2):e70000.

PMID: 39905275 PMC: 11794679. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.70000.


Effects of beta-band and gamma-band rhythmic stimulation on motor inhibition.

Leunissen I, Van Steenkiste M, Heise K, Monteiro T, Dunovan K, Mantini D iScience. 2022; 25(5):104338.

PMID: 35602965 PMC: 9117874. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104338.


Resting-state theta activity is linked to information content-specific coding levels during response inhibition.

Pscherer C, Muckschel M, Bluschke A, Beste C Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4530.

PMID: 35296740 PMC: 8927579. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08510-8.


Establishing a Right Frontal Beta Signature for Stopping Action in Scalp EEG: Implications for Testing Inhibitory Control in Other Task Contexts.

Wagner J, Wessel J, Ghahremani A, Aron A J Cogn Neurosci. 2017; 30(1):107-118.

PMID: 28880766 PMC: 5908247. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01183.

References
1.
van den Wildenberg W, Burle B, Vidal F, van der Molen M, Ridderinkhof K, Hasbroucq T . Mechanisms and dynamics of cortical motor inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm: a TMS study. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009; 22(2):225-39. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21248. View

2.
Huster R, Plis S, Calhoun V . Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation. Front Neurosci. 2015; 9:254. PMC: 4518160. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00254. View

3.
Bastos A, Schoffelen J . A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls. Front Syst Neurosci. 2016; 9:175. PMC: 4705224. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175. View

4.
Huster R, Plis S, Lavallee C, Calhoun V, Herrmann C . Functional and effective connectivity of stopping. Neuroimage. 2014; 94:120-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.034. View

5.
Wessel J, Aron A . It's not too late: the onset of the frontocentral P3 indexes successful response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Psychophysiology. 2014; 52(4):472-80. PMC: 4830357. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12374. View