A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls

Overview

Journal Front Syst Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2016 Jan 19

PMID 26778976

Citations 447

Authors

Andre M Bastos

Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Oscillatory neuronal activity may provide a mechanism for dynamic network coordination. Rhythmic neuronal interactions can be quantified using multiple metrics, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. This tutorial will review and summarize current analysis methods used in the field of invasive and non-invasive electrophysiology to study the dynamic connections between neuronal populations. First, we review metrics for functional connectivity, including coherence, phase synchronization, phase-slope index, and Granger causality, with the specific aim to provide an intuition for how these metrics work, as well as their quantitative definition. Next, we highlight a number of interpretational caveats and common pitfalls that can arise when performing functional connectivity analysis, including the common reference problem, the signal to noise ratio problem, the volume conduction problem, the common input problem, and the sample size bias problem. These pitfalls will be illustrated by presenting a set of MATLAB-scripts, which can be executed by the reader to simulate each of these potential problems. We discuss how these issues can be addressed using current methods.

Citing Articles

Functional Connectivity in Chronic Schizophrenia: An EEG Resting-State Study with Corrected Imaginary Phase-Locking.

Domingos C, Wieclawski W, Frycz S, Wojcik M, Jani M, Dudzinska O Brain Behav. 2025; 15(3):e70370.

PMID: 40079512 PMC: 11905041. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70370.

Theta and alpha connectivity in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Barnes S, Thomas M, McClintock P, Stefanovska A Brain Commun. 2025; 7(2):fcaf084.

PMID: 40070442 PMC: 11894932. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf084.

Parietal cortex is recruited by frontal and cingulate areas to support action monitoring and updating during stopping.

Kang J, Mattar L, Vergara J, Gobo V, Rey H, Heilbronner S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060422 PMC: 11888462. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.28.640787.

Site- and electroencephalogram-frequency-specific effects of 800-nm prefrontal transcranial photobiomodulation on electroencephalogram global network topology in young adults.

Kang S, Li L, Shahdadian S, Wu A, Liu H Neurophotonics. 2025; 12(1):015011.

PMID: 40018415 PMC: 11866628. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.12.1.015011.

Functional and effective EEG connectivity patterns in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.

Paitel E, Otteman C, Polking M, Licht H, Nielson K Front Aging Neurosci. 2025; 17:1496235.

PMID: 40013094 PMC: 11861106. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1496235.

References

Usrey W, Reppas J, Reid R . Paired-spike interactions and synaptic efficacy of retinal inputs to the thalamus. Nature. 1998; 395(6700):384-7. DOI: 10.1038/26487. View

Wen X, Rangarajan G, Ding M . Multivariate Granger causality: an estimation framework based on factorization of the spectral density matrix. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2013; 371(1997):20110610. PMC: 3971884. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0610. View

Varela F, Lachaux J, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J . The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(4):229-39. DOI: 10.1038/35067550. View

Fries P, Reynolds J, Rorie A, DeSimone R . Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science. 2001; 291(5508):1560-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1055465. View

Kaminski M, Liang H . Causal influence: advances in neurosignal analysis. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2005; 33(4):347-430. DOI: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v33.i4.20. View

Blinowska K . Review of the methods of determination of directed connectivity from multichannel data. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011; 49(5):521-9. PMC: 3097342. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-011-0739-x. View

Brovelli A . Statistical analysis of single-trial Granger causality spectra. Comput Math Methods Med. 2012; 2012:697610. PMC: 3357972. DOI: 10.1155/2012/697610. View

Dhamala M, Rangarajan G, Ding M . Estimating Granger causality from fourier and wavelet transforms of time series data. Phys Rev Lett. 2008; 100(1):018701. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.018701. View

Niso G, Bruna R, Pereda E, Gutierrez R, Bajo R, Maestu F . HERMES: towards an integrated toolbox to characterize functional and effective brain connectivity. Neuroinformatics. 2013; 11(4):405-34. DOI: 10.1007/s12021-013-9186-1. View

10.

Nunez P, Silberstein R, Shi Z, Carpenter M, Srinivasan R, Tucker D . EEG coherency II: experimental comparisons of multiple measures. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 110(3):469-86. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(98)00043-1. View

11.

Barnett L, Seth A . Behaviour of Granger causality under filtering: theoretical invariance and practical application. J Neurosci Methods. 2011; 201(2):404-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.010. View

12.

Vinck M, Huurdeman L, Bosman C, Fries P, Battaglia F, Pennartz C . How to detect the Granger-causal flow direction in the presence of additive noise?. Neuroimage. 2014; 108:301-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.017. View

13.

Salazar R, Dotson N, Bressler S, Gray C . Content-specific fronto-parietal synchronization during visual working memory. Science. 2012; 338(6110):1097-100. PMC: 4038369. DOI: 10.1126/science.1224000. View

14.

Lindner M, Vicente R, Priesemann V, Wibral M . TRENTOOL: a Matlab open source toolbox to analyse information flow in time series data with transfer entropy. BMC Neurosci. 2011; 12:119. PMC: 3287134. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-119. View

15.

Kraskov A, Stogbauer H, Grassberger P . Estimating mutual information. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004; 69(6 Pt 2):066138. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066138. View

16.

Stam C, Nolte G, Daffertshofer A . Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007; 28(11):1178-93. PMC: 6871367. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20346. View

17.

Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J . FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011; 2011:156869. PMC: 3021840. DOI: 10.1155/2011/156869. View

18.

Ray S . Challenges in the quantification and interpretation of spike-LFP relationships. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014; 31:111-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.09.004. View

19.

Fries P . A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(10):474-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011. View

20.

Saalmann Y, Pinsk M, Wang L, Li X, Kastner S . The pulvinar regulates information transmission between cortical areas based on attention demands. Science. 2012; 337(6095):753-6. PMC: 3714098. DOI: 10.1126/science.1223082. View