» Articles » PMID: 27857195

Synthesis of (3R)-acetoin and 2,3-butanediol Isomers by Metabolically Engineered Lactococcus Lactis

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Nov 19
PMID 27857195
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The potential that lies in harnessing the chemical synthesis capabilities inherent in living organisms is immense. Here we demonstrate how the biosynthetic machinery of Lactococcus lactis, can be diverted to make (3R)-acetoin and the derived 2,3-butanediol isomers meso-(2,3)-butanediol (m-BDO) and (2R,3R)-butanediol (R-BDO). Efficient production of (3R)-acetoin was accomplished using a strain where the competing lactate, acetate and ethanol forming pathways had been blocked. By introducing different alcohol dehydrogenases into this strain, either EcBDH from Enterobacter cloacae or SadB from Achromobacter xylosooxidans, it was possible to achieve high-yield production of m-BDO or R-BDO respectively. To achieve biosustainable production of these chemicals from dairy waste, we transformed the above strains with the lactose plasmid pLP712. This enabled efficient production of (3R)-acetoin, m-BDO and R-BDO from processed whey waste, with titers of 27, 51, and 32 g/L respectively. The corresponding yields obtained were 0.42, 0.47 and 0.40 g/g lactose, which is 82%, 89%, and 76% of maximum theoretical yield respectively. These results clearly demonstrate that L. lactis is an excellent choice as a cell factory for transforming lactose containing dairy waste into value added chemicals.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of 2,3-butanediol derived from whey fermentation as an effective bio-based monomer for waterborne polyurethane dispersions.

German-Ayuso L, Cobos R, Lorenzo L, Rio F, Prieto-Fernandez S, Roncal T Front Chem. 2025; 12():1516427.

PMID: 39834847 PMC: 11743733. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1516427.


Process scale-up simulation and techno-economic assessment of ethanol fermentation from cheese whey.

Colacicco M, De Micco C, Macrelli S, Agrimi G, Janssen M, Bettiga M Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2024; 17(1):124.

PMID: 39342290 PMC: 11439329. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-024-02567-5.


A Point Mutation in Cassette Relieves the Repression Regulation of CcpA Resulting in an Increase in the Degradation of 2,3-Butanediol in .

Xu X, Liu F, Qiao W, Dong Y, Yang H, Liu F Microorganisms. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38674718 PMC: 11051896. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12040773.


Application of microbial resources in biorefineries: Current trend and future prospects.

Gaur S, Kaur M, Kalra R, Rene E, Goel M Heliyon. 2024; 10(8):e28615.

PMID: 38628756 PMC: 11019186. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28615.


Mechanism of microbial production of acetoin and 2,3-butanediol optical isomers and substrate specificity of butanediol dehydrogenase.

Li Y, Zhao X, Yao M, Yang W, Han Y, Liu L Microb Cell Fact. 2023; 22(1):165.

PMID: 37644496 PMC: 10466699. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-023-02163-6.


References
1.
Ying X, Ma K . Characterization of a zinc-containing alcohol dehydrogenase with stereoselectivity from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus guaymasensis. J Bacteriol. 2011; 193(12):3009-19. PMC: 3133181. DOI: 10.1128/JB.01433-10. View

2.
Jensen N, Melchiorsen C, Jokumsen K, Villadsen J . Metabolic behavior of Lactococcus lactis MG1363 in microaerobic continuous cultivation at a low dilution rate. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001; 67(6):2677-82. PMC: 92924. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2677-2682.2001. View

3.
Wang Q, Chen T, Zhao X, Chamu J . Metabolic engineering of thermophilic Bacillus licheniformis for chiral pure D-2,3-butanediol production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012; 109(7):1610-21. DOI: 10.1002/bit.24427. View

4.
Fu J, Huo G, Feng L, Mao Y, Wang Z, Ma H . Metabolic engineering of Bacillus subtilis for chiral pure meso-2,3-butanediol production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016; 9:90. PMC: 4837526. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0502-5. View

5.
Zhang L, Guo Z, Chen J, Xu Q, Lin H, Hu K . Mechanism of 2,3-butanediol stereoisomers formation in a newly isolated Serratia sp. T241. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:19257. PMC: 4709696. DOI: 10.1038/srep19257. View