» Articles » PMID: 27815546

Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity As a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2016 Nov 6
PMID 27815546
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The audiogram predicts <30% of the variance in speech-reception thresholds (SRTs) for hearing-impaired (HI) listeners fitted with individualized frequency-dependent gain. The remaining variance could reflect suprathreshold distortion in the auditory pathways or nonauditory factors such as cognitive processing. The relationship between a measure of suprathreshold auditory function-spectrotemporal modulation (STM) sensitivity-and SRTs in noise was examined for 154 HI listeners fitted with individualized frequency-specific gain. SRTs were measured for 65-dB SPL sentences presented in speech-weighted noise or four-talker babble to an individually programmed master hearing aid, with the output of an ear-simulating coupler played through insert earphones. Modulation-depth detection thresholds were measured over headphones for STM (2cycles/octave density, 4-Hz rate) applied to an 85-dB SPL, 2-kHz lowpass-filtered pink-noise carrier. SRTs were correlated with both the high-frequency (2-6 kHz) pure-tone average (HFA; R= .31) and STM sensitivity (R= .28). Combined with the HFA, STM sensitivity significantly improved the SRT prediction (ΔR= .13; total R= .44). The remaining unaccounted variance might be attributable to variability in cognitive function and other dimensions of suprathreshold distortion. STM sensitivity was most critical in predicting SRTs for listeners < 65 years old or with HFA <53 dB HL. Results are discussed in the context of previous work suggesting that STM sensitivity for low rates and low-frequency carriers is impaired by a reduced ability to use temporal fine-structure information to detect dynamic spectra. STM detection is a fast test of suprathreshold auditory function for frequencies <2 kHz that complements the HFA to predict variability in hearing-aid outcomes for speech perception in noise.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and Repeatability of an Abbreviated Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Test Battery.

Cherri D, Ozmeral E, Gallun F, Seitz A, Eddins D J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024; 68(2):719-739.

PMID: 39700469 PMC: 11842072. DOI: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00590.


Adaptation to Noise in Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Word Recognition.

Lopez-Ramos D, Marrufo-Perez M, Eustaquio-Martin A, Lopez-Bascuas L, Lopez-Poveda E Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241266322.

PMID: 39267369 PMC: 11401146. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241266322.


Is Recognition of Speech in Noise Related to Memory Disruption Caused by Irrelevant Sound?.

Oberfeld D, Staab K, Kattner F, Ellermeier W Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241262517.

PMID: 39051688 PMC: 11273587. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241262517.


A review of auditory processing and cognitive change during normal ageing, and the implications for setting hearing aids for older adults.

Windle R, Dillon H, Heinrich A Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1122420.

PMID: 37409017 PMC: 10318159. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1122420.


Human-Like Modulation Sensitivity Emerging through Optimization to Natural Sound Recognition.

Koumura T, Terashima H, Furukawa S J Neurosci. 2023; 43(21):3876-3894.

PMID: 37185101 PMC: 10219008. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-22.2023.


References
1.
Won J, Moon I, Jin S, Park H, Woo J, Cho Y . Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users. PLoS One. 2015; 10(10):e0140920. PMC: 4617902. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140920. View

2.
Stone M, Moore B . Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 123(2):1063-76. DOI: 10.1121/1.2821969. View

3.
Johnson E . Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS. Trends Amplif. 2013; 17(3):143-70. PMC: 4070617. DOI: 10.1177/1084713813506301. View

4.
Akeroyd M, Arlinger S, Bentler R, Boothroyd A, Dillier N, Dreschler W . International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests. ICRA Working Group on Multilingual Speech Tests. Int J Audiol. 2015; 54 Suppl 2:17-22. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1030513. View

5.
Wang D, Kjems U, Pedersen M, Boldt J, Lunner T . Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 125(4):2336-47. DOI: 10.1121/1.3083233. View