» Articles » PMID: 3700857

Auditory Filter Shapes in Subjects with Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Impairments

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 1986 Apr 1
PMID 3700857
Citations 100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The shape of the auditory filter was estimated at three center frequencies, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz, for five subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. Additional measurements were made at 1.0 kHz using one subject with a unilateral impairment and six subjects with bilateral impairments. Subjects were chosen who had thresholds in the impaired ears which were relatively flat as a function of frequency and ranged from 15 to 70 dB HL. The filter shapes were estimated by measuring thresholds for sinusoidal signals (frequency f) in the presence of two bands of noise, 0.4 f wide, one above and one below f. The spectrum level of the noise was 50 dB (re: 20 mu Pa) and the noise bands were placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically about the signal frequency. The deviation of the nearer edge of each noise band from f varied from 0.0 to 0.8 f. For the normal ears, the filters were markedly asymmetric for center frequencies of 1.0 and 2.0 kHz, the high-frequency branch being steeper. At 0.5 kHz, the filters were more symmetric. For the impaired ears, the filter shapes varied considerably from one subject to another. For most subjects, the lower branch of the filter was much less steep than normal. The upper branch was often less steep than normal, but a few subjects showed a near normal upper branch. For the subjects with unilateral impairments, the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of the filter was always greater for the impaired ear than for the normal ear at each center frequency. For three subjects at 0.5 kHz and one subject at 1.0 kHz, the filter had too little selectivity for its shape to be determined.

Citing Articles

Neural-WDRC: A Deep Learning Wide Dynamic Range Compression Method Combined With Controllable Noise Reduction for Hearing Aids.

Zhang H, Moore B, Jiang F, Diao M, Ji F, Li X Trends Hear. 2025; 29:23312165241309301.

PMID: 39865875 PMC: 11770718. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241309301.


Effects of spectral manipulations of music mixes on musical scene analysis abilities of hearing-impaired listeners.

Benjamin A, Siedenburg K PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316442.

PMID: 39792818 PMC: 11723546. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316442.


Feasibility and Repeatability of an Abbreviated Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Test Battery.

Cherri D, Ozmeral E, Gallun F, Seitz A, Eddins D J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024; 68(2):719-739.

PMID: 39700469 PMC: 11842072. DOI: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00590.


A Step Toward Precision Audiology: Individual Differences and Characteristic Profiles From Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities.

Cherri D, Eddins D, Ozmeral E Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241263485.

PMID: 39099537 PMC: 11301744. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241263485.


The impact of tinnitus on speech perception in noise: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Madhukesh S, Palaniswamy H, Ganapathy K, Rajashekhar B, Nisha K Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(12):6211-6228.

PMID: 39060407 PMC: 11564254. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08844-1.