» Articles » PMID: 12918610

Cognitive Function in Relation to Hearing Aid Use

Overview
Journal Int J Audiol
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2003 Aug 16
PMID 12918610
Citations 119
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate possible relationships between cognitive function and hearing aid use. In Experiment 1, 72 first-time hearing aid users were tested for speech recognition in noise (Hagerman sentence test) with and without hearing aids. Cognitive function was assessed by tests of working memory (reading span test) and verbal information-processing speed. The results indicate that, after controlling for age and hearing loss, significant correlations exist between the measures of cognitive performance and speech recognition in noise, both with and without hearing aids. High cognitive performance was associated with high performance in the speech recognition task. In Experiment 2, 17 first-time hearing aid users with either high or low working-memory capacity tested an experimental hearing aid which processed the sound differently depending on whether or not speech was detected. The results revealed that those with high working-memory capacity were better than those with low capacity at identifying and reporting the specific processing effects of the aid. This may have implications for how reported results should be interpreted in a research context, how a person's rehabilitation needs are formulated, and how hearing aid controls should be supervised. In conclusion, careful attention should be paid to the cognitive status of listeners, as it can have a significant influence on their ability to utilize their hearing aids.

Citing Articles

Development of a checklist for cognitive assessment requirements (CARE) based on a Delphi consensus study.

Nejati V, Estaji R, Balanza-Martinez V, Balota D, Barker-Collo S, Bell M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3146.

PMID: 39856338 PMC: 11760535. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87380-2.


Feasibility and Repeatability of an Abbreviated Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Test Battery.

Cherri D, Ozmeral E, Gallun F, Seitz A, Eddins D J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024; 68(2):719-739.

PMID: 39700469 PMC: 11842072. DOI: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00590.


Processing of Visual Speech Cues in Speech-in-Noise Comprehension Depends on Working Memory Capacity and Enhances Neural Speech Tracking in Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.

Frei V, Schmitt R, Meyer M, Giroud N Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241287622.

PMID: 39444375 PMC: 11520018. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241287622.


A Step Toward Precision Audiology: Individual Differences and Characteristic Profiles From Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities.

Cherri D, Eddins D, Ozmeral E Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241263485.

PMID: 39099537 PMC: 11301744. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241263485.


Client Oriented Scale of Improvement in First-Time and Experienced Hearing Aid Users: An Analysis of Five Predetermined Predictability Categories through Audiometric and Speech Testing.

Salvago P, Vaccaro D, Plescia F, Vitale R, Cirrincione L, Evola L J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999521 PMC: 11242641. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133956.