Motivation Alters Impression Formation and Related Neural Systems

Overview

Journal Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci

Specialties Neurology
Social Sciences

Date 2016 Nov 1

PMID 27798250

Citations 10

Authors

Brent L Hughes

Jamil Zaki

Nalini Ambady

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Observers frequently form impressions of other people based on complex or conflicting information. Rather than being objective, these impressions are often biased by observers' motives. For instance, observers often downplay negative information they learn about ingroup members. Here, we characterize the neural systems associated with biased impression formation. Participants learned positive and negative information about ingroup and outgroup social targets. Following this information, participants worsened their impressions of outgroup, but not ingroup, targets. This tendency was associated with a failure to engage neural structures including lateral prefrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, temporoparietal junction, Insula and Precuneus when processing negative information about ingroup (but not outgroup) targets. To the extent that participants engaged these regions while learning negative information about ingroup members, they exhibited less ingroup bias in their impressions. These data are consistent with a model of 'effortless bias', under which perceivers fail to process goal-inconsistent information in order to maintain desired conclusions.

Citing Articles

Tracking politically motivated reasoning in the brain: the role of mentalizing, value-encoding, and error detection networks.

Lois G, Tsakas E, Yuen K, Riedl A Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 19(1).

PMID: 39167464 PMC: 11412250. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae056.

Theory of Mind Following the Violation of Strong and Weak Prior Beliefs.

Kim M, Mende-Siedlecki P, Anzellotti S, Young L Cereb Cortex. 2020; 31(2):884-898.

PMID: 32959050 PMC: 7786349. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa263.

An association between biased impression updating and relationship facilitation: A behavioral and fMRI investigation.

Park B, Young L J Exp Soc Psychol. 2020; 87.

PMID: 32863427 PMC: 7453880. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103916.

The role of right temporoparietal junction in processing social prediction error across relationship contexts.

Park B, Fareri D, Delgado M, Young L Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020; 16(8):772-781.

PMID: 32483611 PMC: 8343573. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa072.

Social motivation is associated with increased weight granted to cooperation-related impressions in face evaluation tasks.

Safra L, Baumard N, Wyart V, Chevallier C PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0230011.

PMID: 32310985 PMC: 7170278. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230011.

References

Ma N, Vandekerckhove M, Baetens K, Van Overwalle F, Seurinck R, Fias W . Inconsistencies in spontaneous and intentional trait inferences. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011; 7(8):937-50. PMC: 3501697. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsr064. View

Behrens T, Hunt L, Woolrich M, Rushworth M . Associative learning of social value. Nature. 2008; 456(7219):245-9. PMC: 2605577. DOI: 10.1038/nature07538. View

Kato J, Ide H, Kabashima I, Kadota H, Takano K, Kansaku K . Neural correlates of attitude change following positive and negative advertisements. Front Behav Neurosci. 2009; 3:6. PMC: 2691152. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.08.006.2009. View

Mende-Siedlecki P, Baron S, Todorov A . Diagnostic value underlies asymmetric updating of impressions in the morality and ability domains. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(50):19406-15. PMC: 6618766. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2334-13.2013. View

Sharot T, Korn C, Dolan R . How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(11):1475-9. PMC: 3204264. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2949. View

West R, Meserve R, Stanovich K . Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012; 103(3):506-19. DOI: 10.1037/a0028857. View

Achtziger A, Alos-Ferrer C, Hugelschafer S, Steinhauser M . The neural basis of belief updating and rational decision making. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012; 9(1):55-62. PMC: 3871726. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nss099. View

Shenhav A, Straccia M, Cohen J, Botvinick M . Anterior cingulate engagement in a foraging context reflects choice difficulty, not foraging value. Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17(9):1249-54. PMC: 4156480. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3771. View

Braver T . The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012; 16(2):106-13. PMC: 3289517. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010. View

10.

Zaki J . Cue Integration: A Common Framework for Social Cognition and Physical Perception. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 8(3):296-312. DOI: 10.1177/1745691613475454. View

11.

Knill D, Pouget A . The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci. 2004; 27(12):712-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007. View

12.

Levine M, Prosser A, Evans D, Reicher S . Identity and emergency intervention: how social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005; 31(4):443-53. DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271651. View

13.

Amodio D, Devine P, Harmon-Jones E . Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: the role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008; 94(1):60-74. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.60. View

14.

Mende-Siedlecki P, Cai Y, Todorov A . The neural dynamics of updating person impressions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012; 8(6):623-31. PMC: 3739907. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nss040. View

15.

Freeman J, Schiller D, Rule N, Ambady N . The neural origins of superficial and individuated judgments about ingroup and outgroup members. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009; 31(1):150-9. PMC: 6870618. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20852. View

16.

Beer J, Hughes B . Neural systems of social comparison and the "above-average" effect. Neuroimage. 2009; 49(3):2671-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.075. View

17.

Richeson J, Baird A, Gordon H, Heatherton T, Wyland C, Trawalter S . An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 6(12):1323-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn1156. View

18.

Van Bavel J, Packer D, Cunningham W . The neural substrates of in-group bias: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(11):1131-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02214.x. View

19.

Vilares I, Howard J, Fernandes H, Gottfried J, Kording K . Differential representations of prior and likelihood uncertainty in the human brain. Curr Biol. 2012; 22(18):1641-8. PMC: 3461114. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.010. View

20.

Stern E, Gonzalez R, Welsh R, Taylor S . Updating beliefs for a decision: neural correlates of uncertainty and underconfidence. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(23):8032-41. PMC: 2896864. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4729-09.2010. View