» Articles » PMID: 31680152

The Neural Basis of Shared Preference Learning

Overview
Date 2019 Nov 5
PMID 31680152
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During our daily lives, we often learn about the similarity of the traits and preferences of others to our own and use that information during our social interactions. However, it is unclear how the brain represents similarity between the self and others. One possible mechanism is to track similarity to oneself regardless of the identity of the other (Similarity account); an alternative is to track each other person in terms of consistency of their choice similarity with respect to the choices they have made before (consistency account). Our study combined functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and computational modelling of reinforcement learning (RL) to investigate the neural processes that underlie learning about preference similarity. Participants chose which of two pieces of artwork they preferred and saw the choices of one agent who usually shared their preference and another agent who usually did not. We modelled neural activation with RL models based on the similarity and consistency accounts. Our results showed that activity in brain areas linked to reward and social cognition followed the consistency account. Our findings suggest that impressions of other people can be calculated in a person-specific manner, which assumes that each individual behaves consistently with their past choices.

Citing Articles

Social feedback promotes positive social sharing, trust, and closeness.

Brudner E, Fareri D, Shehata S, Delgado M Emotion. 2022; 23(6):1536-1548.

PMID: 36355668 PMC: 10169536. DOI: 10.1037/emo0001182.


Adaptive Empathy: Empathic Response Selection as a Dynamic, Feedback-Based Learning Process.

Kozakevich Arbel E, Shamay-Tsoory S, Hertz U Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:706474.

PMID: 34366937 PMC: 8339423. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.706474.


Learning how to behave: cognitive learning processes account for asymmetries in adaptation to social norms.

Hertz U Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1952):20210293.

PMID: 34074119 PMC: 8170188. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0293.


Computational modelling of social cognition and behaviour-a reinforcement learning primer.

Lockwood P, Klein-Flugge M Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020; 16(8):761-771.

PMID: 32232358 PMC: 8343561. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa040.

References
1.
Gilron R, Gutchess A . Remembering first impressions: effects of intentionality and diagnosticity on subsequent memory. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011; 12(1):85-98. PMC: 3267862. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-011-0074-6. View

2.
Ruff C, Fehr E . The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014; 15(8):549-62. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3776. View

3.
Dzhelyova M, Perrett D, Jentzsch I . Temporal dynamics of trustworthiness perception. Brain Res. 2011; 1435:81-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.11.043. View

4.
Hughes B, Zaki J, Ambady N . Motivation alters impression formation and related neural systems. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016; 12(1):49-60. PMC: 5390749. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw147. View

5.
Nathan Spreng R, Mar R, Kim A . The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: a quantitative meta-analysis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008; 21(3):489-510. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21029. View