» Articles » PMID: 22245618

The Variable Nature of Cognitive Control: a Dual Mechanisms Framework

Overview
Journal Trends Cogn Sci
Date 2012 Jan 17
PMID 22245618
Citations 782
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A core component of cognitive control - the ability to regulate thoughts and actions in accordance with internally represented behavioral goals - might be its intrinsic variability. In this article, I describe the dual mechanisms of control (DMC) framework, which postulates that this variability might arise from qualitative distinctions in temporal dynamics between proactive and reactive modes of control. Proactive control reflects the sustained and anticipatory maintenance of goal-relevant information within lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) to enable optimal cognitive performance, whereas reactive control reflects transient stimulus-driven goal reactivation that recruits lateral PFC (plus a wider brain network) based on interference demands or episodic associations. I summarize recent research that demonstrates how the DMC framework provides a coherent explanation of three sources of cognitive control variation - intra-individual, inter-individual and between-groups - in terms of proactive versus reactive control biases.

Citing Articles

Cognitive control: modeling the impact on mental health.

Alker L Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1452714.

PMID: 40062198 PMC: 11885272. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1452714.


Compositional architecture: Orthogonal neural codes for task context and spatial memory in prefrontal cortex.

Park J, Holmes C, Snyder L bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060470 PMC: 11888474. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.25.640211.


Parietal cortex is recruited by frontal and cingulate areas to support action monitoring and updating during stopping.

Kang J, Mattar L, Vergara J, Gobo V, Rey H, Heilbronner S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060422 PMC: 11888462. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.28.640787.


Reduced temporal and spatial stability of neural activity patterns predict cognitive control deficits in children with ADHD.

Gao Z, Duberg K, Warren S, Zheng L, Hinshaw S, Menon V Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2346.

PMID: 40057478 PMC: 11890578. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57685-x.


No evidence that selection is resource-demanding in conflict and bilingual language production tasks: Implications for theories of adaptive control and language-control associations.

Spinelli G, Sulpizio S Psychon Bull Rev. 2025; .

PMID: 40055246 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-025-02672-y.


References
1.
Ullsperger M, King J . Proactive and reactive recruitment of cognitive control: Comment on Hikosaka and Isoda. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010; 14(5):191-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.006. View

2.
Duncan J, Emslie H, Williams P, Johnson R, Freer C . Intelligence and the frontal lobe: the organization of goal-directed behavior. Cogn Psychol. 1996; 30(3):257-303. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0008. View

3.
McElree B . Working memory and focal attention. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 27(3):817-35. PMC: 3077110. View

4.
Miyake A, Friedman N, Emerson M, Witzki A, Howerter A, Wager T . The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000; 41(1):49-100. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734. View

5.
Braver T, Barch D, Keys B, Carter C, Cohen J, Kaye J . Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002; 130(4):746-63. View