» Articles » PMID: 27757007

Focused Ultrasound in Ophthalmology

Overview
Journal Clin Ophthalmol
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2016 Oct 21
PMID 27757007
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of focused ultrasound to obtain diagnostically significant information about the eye goes back to the 1950s. This review describes the historical and technological development of ophthalmic ultrasound and its clinical application and impact. Ultrasound, like light, can be focused, which is crucial for formation of high-resolution, diagnostically useful images. Focused, single-element, mechanically scanned transducers are most common in ophthalmology. Specially designed transducers have been used to generate focused, high-intensity ultrasound that through thermal effects has been used to treat glaucoma (via ciliodestruction), tumors, and other pathologies. Linear and annular transducer arrays offer synthetic focusing in which precise timing of the excitation of independently addressable array elements allows formation of a converging wavefront to create a focus at one or more programmable depths. Most recently, linear array-based plane-wave ultrasound, in which the array emits an unfocused wavefront and focusing is performed solely on received data, has been demonstrated for imaging ocular anatomy and blood flow. While the history of ophthalmic ultrasound extends back over half-a-century, new and powerful technologic advances continue to be made, offering the prospect of novel diagnostic capabilities.

Citing Articles

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) findings over time: ultrasound and ultra-widefield fundus photography.

Pellegrini G, Bordon A, Allemann N Int J Retina Vitreous. 2025; 11(1):7.

PMID: 39833969 PMC: 11748537. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-024-00625-6.


Feasibility of Backscattering Coefficient Evaluation of Soft Tissue Using High-Frequency Annular Array Probe.

Choi J, Ketterling J, Mamou J, Hoerig C, Hirata S, Yoshida K Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(22).

PMID: 39598896 PMC: 11598731. DOI: 10.3390/s24227118.


Integrating a Fundus Camera with High-Frequency Ultrasound for Precise Ocular Lesion Assessment.

Rossi A, Zeng Y, Rahimi M, Son T, Heiferman M, Gong C Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38534234 PMC: 10967801. DOI: 10.3390/bios14030127.


A comparison of five point-of-care ultrasound devices for use in ophthalmology and facial aesthetics.

Park K, Mehta P, Tran C, Parikh A, Zhou Q, Zhang-Nunes S Ultrasound. 2024; 32(1):28-35.

PMID: 38314019 PMC: 10836224. DOI: 10.1177/1742271X231166895.


A systematic review of ultrasound-mediated drug delivery to the eye and critical insights to facilitate a timely path to the clinic.

Rad I, Chapman L, Tupally K, Veidt M, Al-Sadiq H, Sullivan R Theranostics. 2023; 13(11):3582-3638.

PMID: 37441595 PMC: 10334839. DOI: 10.7150/thno.82884.


References
1.
Pavlin C, Sherar M, Foster F . Subsurface ultrasound microscopic imaging of the intact eye. Ophthalmology. 1990; 97(2):244-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32598-8. View

2.
Oksala A, Lehtinen A . Measurement of the velocity of sound in some parts of the eye. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1958; 36(4):633-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1958.tb02271.x. View

3.
Thijssen J . The emmetropic and the iseikonic implant lens: computer calculation of the refractive power and its accuracy. Ophthalmologica. 1975; 171(6):467-86. DOI: 10.1159/000307571. View

4.
Sherar M, Starkoski B, Taylor W, Foster F . A 100 MHz B-scan ultrasound backscatter microscope. Ultrason Imaging. 1989; 11(2):95-105. DOI: 10.1177/016173468901100202. View

5.
de Boer J, Cense B, Park B, Pierce M, Tearney G, Bouma B . Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett. 2003; 28(21):2067-9. DOI: 10.1364/ol.28.002067. View