» Articles » PMID: 27721558

Being Trusted: How Team Generational Age Diversity Promotes and Undermines Trust in Cross-boundary Relationships

Overview
Journal J Organ Behav
Date 2016 Oct 11
PMID 27721558
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We examine how demographic context influences the trust that boundary spanners experience in their dyadic relationships with clients. Because of the salience of age as a demographic characteristic as well as the increasing prevalence of age diversity and intergenerational conflict in the workplace, we focus on team age diversity as a demographic social context that affects trust between boundary spanners and their clients. Using social categorization theory and theories of social capital, we develop and test our contextual argument that a boundary spanner's experience of being trusted is influenced by the social categorization processes that occur in dyadic interactions with a specific client and, simultaneously, by similar social categorization processes that influence the degree to which the client team as a whole serves as a cooperative resource for demographically similar versus dissimilar boundary spanner-client dyads. Using a sample of 168 senior boundary spanners from the consulting industry, we find that generational diversity among client team members from a client organization undermines the perception of being trusted within homogeneous boundary spanner-client dyads while it enhances the perception of being trusted within heterogeneous dyads. The perception of being trusted is an important aspect of cross-boundary relationships because it influences coordination and the costs associated with coordination.

Citing Articles

Investing to gain others' trust: Cognitive abstraction increases prosocial behavior and trust received from others.

van Houwelingen G, van Dijke M PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284500.

PMID: 37058512 PMC: 10104375. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284500.


Entrepreneurs' role overload and empowering leadership: A reciprocal relationship based on conservation of resources.

Wang W, Zhao X, Zhang X, Liu Y, Yuan P Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1118099.

PMID: 36949913 PMC: 10025332. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118099.


How improvisation drives lean search: The moderating role of entrepreneurial team heterogeneity and environmental uncertainty.

Huang B, Song J, Jing Y, Xie Y, Li Y Front Psychol. 2022; 13:940273.

PMID: 36248596 PMC: 9557979. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940273.


Being trusted: How team generational age diversity promotes and undermines trust in cross-boundary relationships.

Williams M J Organ Behav. 2016; 37(3):346-373.

PMID: 27721558 PMC: 5049614. DOI: 10.1002/job.2045.

References
1.
Ferrin D, Dirks K, Shah P . Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. J Appl Psychol. 2006; 91(4):870-83. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.870. View

2.
Edwards J, Cable D . The value of value congruence. J Appl Psychol. 2009; 94(3):654-77. DOI: 10.1037/a0014891. View

3.
Colquitt J, Scott B, LePine J . Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. J Appl Psychol. 2007; 92(4):909-27. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909. View

4.
Avery D, McKay P, Wilson D . Engaging the aging workforce: the relationship between perceived age similarity, satisfaction with coworkers, and employee engagement. J Appl Psychol. 2007; 92(6):1542-56. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1542. View

5.
Hewstone M, Rubin M, Willis H . Intergroup bias. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 53:575-604. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109. View