» Articles » PMID: 2771616

Eye Movement Control During Reading: II. Frequency of Refixating a Word

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 1989 Sep 1
PMID 2771616
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An analysis of over 40,000 eye fixations made by college students during reading indicates that the frequency of immediately refixating a word following an initial eye fixation on it varies with the location of that fixation. The refixation frequency is lowest near the center of the word, positively accelerating with distance from the center. The data are well fit by a parabolic function. Assuming that refixation frequency is related to the frequency of successful word identification, the observed curvilinear relation results naturally from models that postulate a linear decrease in visual information with retinal eccentricity. A single letter difference in fixation location in a word can make a sizeable difference in the likelihood of refixating that word. The effects of word length and cultural frequency on the frequency of refixating are also examined.

Citing Articles

The Beijing Sentence Corpus II: A cross-script comparison between traditional and simplified Chinese sentence reading.

Yan M, Pan J, Kliegl R Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(2):60.

PMID: 39825023 PMC: 11748476. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02523-z.


The Role of Morphological Structure in Determining the Optimal Viewing Position During Visual Word Recognition in Beginning Readers.

Ducrot S, Casalis S Children (Basel). 2025; 11(12.

PMID: 39767894 PMC: 11674313. DOI: 10.3390/children11121465.


A corpus of Chinese word segmentation agreement.

Tsang Y, Yan M, Pan J, Chan M Behav Res Methods. 2024; 57(1):25.

PMID: 39733209 PMC: 11682008. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02528-8.


Joint effects of individual reading skills and word properties on Chinese children's eye movements during sentence reading.

Yan M, Pan J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):14754.

PMID: 37679436 PMC: 10485247. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41041-4.


The influence of action on perception spans different effectors.

Bosco A, Sanz Diez P, Filippini M, Fattori P Front Syst Neurosci. 2023; 17:1145643.

PMID: 37205054 PMC: 10185787. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2023.1145643.


References
1.
Kapoula Z, Robinson D . Saccadic undershoot is not inevitable: saccades can be accurate. Vision Res. 1986; 26(5):735-43. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90087-8. View

2.
HOWES D, Solomon R . Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. J Exp Psychol. 1951; 41(6):401-10. DOI: 10.1037/h0056020. View

3.
Jacobs R . Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery. Vision Res. 1979; 19(11):1187-95. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90183-4. View

4.
CORNSWEET T, Crane H . Accurate two-dimensional eye tracker using first and fourth Purkinje images. J Opt Soc Am. 1973; 63(8):921-8. DOI: 10.1364/josa.63.000921. View

5.
Rayner K . Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words. Perception. 1979; 8(1):21-30. DOI: 10.1068/p080021. View