» Articles » PMID: 23074362

The Utility of Modeling Word Identification from Visual Input Within Models of Eye Movements in Reading

Overview
Journal Vis cogn
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2012 Oct 18
PMID 23074362
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Decades of empirical work have shown that a range of eye movement phenomena in reading are sensitive to the details of the process of word identification. Despite this, major models of eye movement control in reading do not explicitly model word identification from visual input. This paper presents a argument for developing models of eye movements that do include detailed models of word identification. Specifically, we argue that insights into eye movement behavior can be gained by understanding which phenomena naturally arise from an account in which the eyes move for efficient word identification, and that one important use of such models is to test which eye movement phenomena can be understood this way. As an extended case study, we present evidence from an extension of a previous model of eye movement control in reading that does explicitly model word identification from visual input, Mr. Chips (Legge, Klitz, & Tjan, 1997), to test two proposals for the effect of using linguistic context on reading efficiency.

Citing Articles

Ongoing Cognitive Processing Influences Precise Eye-Movement Targets in Reading.

Bicknell K, Levy R, Rayner K Psychol Sci. 2020; 31(4):351-362.

PMID: 32105193 PMC: 7436780. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620901766.


What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?.

Kuperberg G, Jaeger T Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016; 31(1):32-59.

PMID: 27135040 PMC: 4850025. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299.

References
1.
Reichle E, Rayner K, Pollatsek A . Eye movements in reading versus nonreading tasks: Using E-Z Reader to understand the role of word/stimulus familiarity. Vis cogn. 2012; 20(4-5):360-390. PMC: 3374660. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2012.667006. View

2.
Reichle E, Pollatsek A, Fisher D, Rayner K . Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychol Rev. 1998; 105(1):125-57. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.125. View

3.
Legge G, Klitz T, Tjan B . Mr. Chips: an ideal-observer model of reading. Psychol Rev. 1997; 104(3):524-53. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.3.524. View

4.
Renninger L, Verghese P, Coughlan J . Where to look next? Eye movements reduce local uncertainty. J Vis. 2007; 7(3):6. DOI: 10.1167/7.3.6. View

5.
Pollatsek A, Perea M, Binder K . The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999; 25(4):1142-58. View