» Articles » PMID: 27703459

Expansion and Functional Divergence of AP2 Group Genes in Spermatophytes Determined by Molecular Evolution and Mutant Analysis

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2016 Oct 6
PMID 27703459
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The () genes represent the AP2 group within a large group of DNA-binding proteins called AP2/EREBP. The gene is functional and necessary for flower development, stem cell maintenance, and seed development, whereas the other members of AP2 group redundantly affect flowering time. Here we study the phylogeny of AP2 group genes in spermatophytes. Spermatophyte AP2 group genes can be classified into AP2 and TOE types, six clades, and we found that the AP2 group homologs in gymnosperms belong to the AP2 type, whereas TOE types are absent, which indicates the AP2 type gene are more ancient and TOE type was split out of AP2 type and losing the major function. In Brassicaceae, the expansion of AP2 and TOE type lead to the gene number of AP2 group were up to six. Purifying selection appears to have been the primary driving force of spermatophyte AP2 group evolution, although positive selection occurred in the AP2 clade. The transition from exon to intron of in mutant leads to the loss of gene function and the same situation was found in . Combining this evolutionary analysis and published research, the results suggest that typical AP2 group genes may first appear in gymnosperms and diverged in angiosperms, following expansion of group members and functional differentiation. In angiosperms, genes (AP2 clade) inherited key functions from ancestors and other genes of AP2 group lost most function but just remained flowering time controlling in gene formation. In this study, the phylogenies of AP2 group genes in spermatophytes was analyzed, which supported the evidence for the research of gene functional evolution of AP2 group.

Citing Articles

Ancient Duplication and Lineage-Specific Transposition Determine Evolutionary Trajectory of Subfamily across Angiosperms.

Zhu X, Hutang G, Gao L Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).

PMID: 38612750 PMC: 11011629. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073941.


Mutations overlying the miR172 target site of TOE-type genes are prime candidate variants for the double-flower trait in mei.

Gattolin S, Calastri E, Tassone M, Cirilli M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7300.

PMID: 38538684 PMC: 10973477. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57589-8.


Reflections on the ABC model of flower development.

Bowman J, Moyroud E Plant Cell. 2024; 36(5):1334-1357.

PMID: 38345422 PMC: 11062442. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koae044.


Genome-Wide Identification of the ERF Transcription Factor Family for Structure Analysis, Expression Pattern, and Response to Drought Stress in .

Zeng D, Dai L, Li X, Li W, Qu G, Li S Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(4).

PMID: 36835107 PMC: 9967527. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043697.


Tomato APETALA2 family member SlTOE1 regulates inflorescence branching by repressing SISTER OF TM3.

Sun S, Wang X, Liu Z, Bai J, Song J, Li R Plant Physiol. 2023; 192(1):293-306.

PMID: 36747310 PMC: 10152655. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiad075.


References
1.
Zhang C, Wei J, He S . Adaptive evolution of the spike gene of SARS coronavirus: changes in positively selected sites in different epidemic groups. BMC Microbiol. 2006; 6:88. PMC: 1609170. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-88. View

2.
Maes T, Van Montagu M, Gerats T . The inflorescence architecture of Petunia hybrida is modified by the Arabidopsis thaliana Ap2 gene. Dev Genet. 1999; 25(3):199-208. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1999)25:3<199::AID-DVG3>3.0.CO;2-L. View

3.
Aukerman M, Sakai H . Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a MicroRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell. 2003; 15(11):2730-41. PMC: 280575. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.016238. View

4.
Bowers J, Chapman B, Rong J, Paterson A . Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature. 2003; 422(6930):433-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature01521. View

5.
Shigyo M, Hasebe M, Ito M . Molecular evolution of the AP2 subfamily. Gene. 2006; 366(2):256-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.08.009. View