» Articles » PMID: 27685132

An EPID-based System for Gantry-resolved MLC Quality Assurance for VMAT

Overview
Date 2016 Sep 30
PMID 27685132
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multileaf collimator (MLC) positions should be precisely and independently mea-sured as a function of gantry angle as part of a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) program for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). It is also ideal that such a QA program has the ability to relate MLC positional accuracy to patient-specific dosimetry in order to determine the clinical significance of any detected MLC errors. In this work we propose a method to verify individual MLC trajectories during VMAT deliveries for use as a routine linear accelerator QA tool. We also extend this method to reconstruct the 3D patient dose in the treatment planning sys-tem based on the measured MLC trajectories and the original DICOM plan file. The method relies on extracting MLC positions from EPID images acquired at 8.41fps during clinical VMAT deliveries. A gantry angle is automatically tagged to each image in order to obtain the MLC trajectories as a function of gantry angle. This analysis was performed for six clinical VMAT plans acquired at monthly intervals for three months. The measured trajectories for each delivery were compared to the MLC positions from the DICOM plan file. The maximum mean error detected was 0.07 mm and a maximum root-mean-square error was 0.8 mm for any leaf of any delivery. The sensitivity of this system was characterized by introducing random and systematic MLC errors into the test plans. It was demonstrated that the system is capable of detecting random and systematic errors on the range of 1-2mm and single leaf calibration errors of 0.5 mm. The methodology developed in the work has potential to be used for efficient routine linear accelerator MLC QA and pretreatment patient-specific QA and has the ability to relate measured MLC positional errors to 3D dosimetric errors within a patient volume.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of an improved picket fence style test for routine MLC positional QA.

Barnes M, Standen T, Blackmore R, Greer P J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 26(2):e14567.

PMID: 39611789 PMC: 11799905. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14567.


A novel EPID-based MLC QA method with log files achieving submillimeter accuracy.

Liu C, Wang B, Bai X, Cheng X, Wang X, Yang X J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(8):e14450.

PMID: 39031891 PMC: 11302811. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14450.


Leaf-individual calibration for a double stack multileaf collimator in photon radiotherapy.

Rippke C, Renkamp C, Attieh C, Schluter F, Buchele C, Debus J Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023; 27:100477.

PMID: 37635846 PMC: 10457557. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100477.


Impact of electronic portal image quality on Elekta AQUA collimator isocenter.

Norvill C J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(4):e13934.

PMID: 36855933 PMC: 10113691. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13934.


Insensitivity of machine log files to MLC leaf backlash and effect of MLC backlash on clinical dynamic MLC motion: An experimental investigation.

Barnes M, Pomare D, Doebrich M, Standen T, Wolf J, Greer P J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 23(9):e13660.

PMID: 35678793 PMC: 9512360. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13660.


References
1.
Van Esch A, Huyskens D, Behrens C, Samsoe E, Sjolin M, Bjelkengren U . Implementing RapidArc into clinical routine: a comprehensive program from machine QA to TPS validation and patient QA. Med Phys. 2011; 38(9):5146-66. DOI: 10.1118/1.3622672. View

2.
Rangel A, Palte G, Dunscombe P . The sensitivity of patient specific IMRT QC to systematic MLC leaf bank offset errors. Med Phys. 2010; 37(7):3862-7. DOI: 10.1118/1.3453576. View

3.
Schreibmann E, Dhabaan A, Elder E, Fox T . Patient-specific quality assurance method for VMAT treatment delivery. Med Phys. 2009; 36(10):4530-5. DOI: 10.1118/1.3213085. View

4.
Otto K . Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008; 35(1):310-7. DOI: 10.1118/1.2818738. View

5.
Vieira S, Dirkx M, Pasma K, Heijmen B . Fast and accurate leaf verification for dynamic multileaf collimation using an electronic portal imaging device. Med Phys. 2002; 29(9):2034-40. DOI: 10.1118/1.1501141. View