» Articles » PMID: 27647141

Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Workers with Sub Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain

Overview
Journal J Occup Rehabil
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Sep 21
PMID 27647141
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose We systematically reviewed the evidence on factors that predict duration of sick leave in workers after 6 weeks low back pain (LBP) related sick leave. We hypothesized that different factors affect the duration of the leave depending on the time away from work. Methods The review occurred in seven phases: (1) developing the central question, (2) conducting the literature search, (3) identifying relevant publications, (4) quality appraisal, (5) data extraction, (6) evidence synthesis, and (7) knowledge translation. We searched for studies that reported episodes of LBP and sick leave that lasted more than 6 weeks. All included studies reported at least one prognostic factor where return to work was the outcome. Results We identified twenty-two relevant publications. The impact of pain, functional status and radiating pain seems to change with duration of work disability. Workers' recovery expectations remain important after 6 weeks. Modified duties are rarely studied in later phases of work disability. Depression/mental health did not appear to be an important factor in later phases. Workplace physical factors remain important. There is insufficient evidence that pain catastrophising and fear avoidance are predictive factors in later phases. There was moderate evidence for age in the later phases. Functional capacity and claim related factors were supported by some evidence. Discusion Physical demands in the workplace are preventing workers from getting back to work in a timely fashion across phases. The psychosocial work environment is understudied in later phases. Overall, we cannot conclude that prognostic factors change over time.

Citing Articles

Does rehabilitation improve work participation in patients with chronic spinal pain after spinal surgery: a systematic review.

Callens J, Lavreysen O, Goudman L, De Smedt A, Putman K, Van de Velde D J Rehabil Med. 2025; 57:jrm25156.

PMID: 39749418 PMC: 11681149. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v57.25156.


Modifiable prognostic factors of high societal costs among people on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: a replication study.

Killingmo R, Rysstad T, Maas E, Pripp A, Aanesen F, Tingulstad A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):990.

PMID: 39627785 PMC: 11613927. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08132-3.


Comparison of Clinical Characteristics between Responders and Non-Responders to Hamstring Stretching in Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Dobija L, Pereira B, Dupeyron A, Coudeyre E Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39410521 PMC: 11476256. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14192117.


Dutch Dataset Vocational Rehabilitation for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Baseline Patients' Characteristics and Program Eligibility.

de Laat F, Killen V, Edelaar M, Nachtegaal J, Reneman M J Occup Rehabil. 2024; .

PMID: 38833120 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10207-w.


Understanding Work Ability in Employees with Pain and Stress-Related Ill-Health: An Explorative Network Analysis of Individual Characteristics and Psychosocial Work Environment.

Zetterberg H, Zhao X, Bergbom S, Golovchanova N, Flink I, Boersma K J Occup Rehabil. 2024; .

PMID: 38743130 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10200-3.


References
1.
Wong S, Wilczynski N, Haynes R, Ramkissoonsingh R . Developing optimal search strategies for detecting sound clinical prediction studies in MEDLINE. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2004; :728-32. PMC: 1479983. View

2.
Leeuw M, Goossens M, Linton S, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen J . The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence. J Behav Med. 2006; 30(1):77-94. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-006-9085-0. View

3.
Reme S, Hagen E, Eriksen H . Expectations, perceptions, and physiotherapy predict prolonged sick leave in subacute low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009; 10:139. PMC: 2780378. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-139. View

4.
Furlan A, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M . 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(18):1929-41. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f. View

5.
Goertz M . Prognostic indicators for acute low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990; 15(12):1307-10. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199012000-00013. View