» Articles » PMID: 38407016

Management of Low Back Pain and Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome: the Guideline of the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF)

Overview
Date 2024 Feb 26
PMID 38407016
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Significant progress and new insights have been gained since the Dutch Physical Therapy guideline on low back pain (LBP) in 2013 and the Cesar en Mensendieck guideline in 2009, necessitating an update of these guidelines.

Aim: To update and develop an evidence-based guideline for the comprehensive management of LBP and lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) without serious specific conditions (red flags) for Dutch physical therapists and Cesar and Mensendieck Therapists.

Design: Clinical practice guideline.

Setting: Inpatient and outpatient.

Population: Adults with LBP and/or LRS.

Methods: Clinically relevant questions were identified based on perceived barriers in current practice of physical therapy. All clinical questions were answered using published guidelines, systematic reviews, narrative reviews or systematic reviews performed by the project group. Recommendations were formulated based on evidence and additional considerations, as described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence-to-Decision framework. Patients participated in every phase.

Results: The guideline describes a comprehensive assessment based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for LBP and LRS, including the identification of alarm symptoms and red flags. Patients are assigned to three treatment profiles (low, moderate and high risk of persistent symptoms) based on prognostic factors for persistent LBP. The guideline recommends offering simple and less intensive support to people who are likely to recover quickly (low-risk profile) and more complex and intensive support to people with a moderate or high risk of persistent complaints. Criteria for initiating and discontinuing physical therapy, and referral to a general practitioner are specified. Recommendations are formulated for information and advice, measurement instruments, active and passive interventions and behavior-oriented treatment.

Conclusions: An evidence based physical therapy guideline for the management of patients with LBP and LRS without red flags for physical therapists and Cesar and Mensendieck therapists was developed. Cornerstones of physical therapy assessment and treatment are risk stratification, shared decision-making, information and advice, and exercises.

Clinical Rehabilitation Impact: This guideline provides guidance for clinicians and patients to optimize treatment outcomes in patients with LBP and LRS and offers transparency for other healthcare providers and stakeholders.

Citing Articles

Analysis and comparison of the trends in burden of low back pain in China and worldwide from 1990 to 2021.

Wei Y, Xie Y, Xuan A, Gu H, Lian Y, Wang Z J Health Popul Nutr. 2025; 44(1):39.

PMID: 39948668 PMC: 11827349. DOI: 10.1186/s41043-025-00768-8.


From Muscle-Bone Concept to the ArthroMyoFascial Complex: A Pragmatic Anatomical Concept for Physiotherapy and Manual Therapy.

Noten K, Amstel R Life (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39063554 PMC: 11278034. DOI: 10.3390/life14070799.


Recent clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain: a global comparison.

Zhou T, Salman D, McGregor A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):344.

PMID: 38693474 PMC: 11061926. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07468-0.


The association of the STarT Back Screening Tool and type of leg pain with low back pain disability trajectories: a prospective cohort study.

Lemmers G, Melis R, Pagen S, Hak R, Snoo E, Westert G BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):193.

PMID: 38439000 PMC: 10910701. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07301-8.


Fascia Tissue Manipulations in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pragmatic Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial of the 4xT Method and Exercise Therapy.

Amstel R, Noten K, Malone S, Vaes P Life (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38276256 PMC: 10820544. DOI: 10.3390/life14010007.


References
1.
Lemeunier N, Leboeuf-Yde C, Gagey O . The natural course of low back pain: a systematic critical literature review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012; 20(1):33. PMC: 3599187. DOI: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-33. View

2.
Oliveira C, Pinheiro M, Teixeira R, Franco M, Silva F, Hisamatsu T . Physical activity as a prognostic factor of pain intensity and disability in patients with low back pain: A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2019; 23(7):1251-1263. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1395. View

3.
Andronis L, Kinghorn P, Qiao S, Whitehurst D, Durrell S, McLeod H . Cost-Effectiveness of Non-Invasive and Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Low Back Pain: a Systematic Literature Review. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016; 15(2):173-201. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-016-0268-8. View

4.
Koes B, Sanders R, Tuut M . [The Dutch Institute for Health Care Improvement (CBO) guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of aspecific acute and chronic low back complaints]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004; 148(7):310-4. View

5.
. United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ. 2004; 329(7479):1381. PMC: 535455. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38282.607859.AE. View