» Articles » PMID: 27625628

Perceptual Load Affects Eyewitness Accuracy and Susceptibility to Leading Questions

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2016 Sep 15
PMID 27625628
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Load Theory (Lavie, 1995, 2005) states that the level of perceptual load in a task (i.e., the amount of information involved in processing task-relevant stimuli) determines the efficiency of selective attention. There is evidence that perceptual load affects distractor processing, with increased inattentional blindness under high load. Given that high load can result in individuals failing to report seeing obvious objects, it is conceivable that load may also impair memory for the scene. The current study is the first to assess the effect of perceptual load on eyewitness memory. Across three experiments (two video-based and one in a driving simulator), the effect of perceptual load on eyewitness memory was assessed. The results showed that eyewitnesses were less accurate under high load, in particular for peripheral details. For example, memory for the central character in the video was not affected by load but memory for a witness who passed by the window at the edge of the scene was significantly worse under high load. High load memories were also more open to suggestion, showing increased susceptibility to leading questions. High visual perceptual load also affected recall for auditory information, illustrating a possible cross-modal perceptual load effect on memory accuracy. These results have implications for eyewitness memory researchers and forensic professionals.

Citing Articles

The effect of surgical masks on identification decisions from masked and unmasked lineups.

Palu A, Raidvee A, Murnikov V, Kask K Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024; 31(5):932-962.

PMID: 39318879 PMC: 11418056. DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2242435.


The impact of virtual reality and distractors on attentional processes: insights from EEG.

Pappalettera C, Miraglia F, Cacciotti A, Nucci L, Tufo G, Rossini P Pflugers Arch. 2024; 476(11):1727-1742.

PMID: 39158612 DOI: 10.1007/s00424-024-03008-w.


Do cognitive abilities reduce eyewitness susceptibility to the misinformation effect? A systematic review.

Brassil M, OMahony C, Greene C Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(6):2410-2436.

PMID: 38696106 PMC: 11680610. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02512-5.


Understanding mental fatigue and its detection: a comparative analysis of assessments and tools.

Kunasegaran K, Hussain Ismail A, Ramasamy S, Gnanou J, Caszo B, Chen P PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15744.

PMID: 37637168 PMC: 10460155. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15744.


The effect of pre-event instructions on eyewitness identification.

Baldassari M, Moore K, Hyman Jr I, Hope L, Mah E, Lindsay D Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023; 8(1):16.

PMID: 36854842 PMC: 9975131. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-023-00471-4.


References
1.
Jenkins R, Lavie N, Driver J . Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005; 12(2):314-20. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196378. View

2.
Couperus J . Perceptual load influences selective attention across development. Dev Psychol. 2011; 47(5):1431-9. DOI: 10.1037/a0024027. View

3.
Cave K, Chen Z . Identifying visual targets amongst interfering distractors: Sorting out the roles of perceptual load, dilution, and attentional zoom. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016; 78(7):1822-38. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1149-9. View

4.
Lavie N, Beck D, Konstantinou N . Blinded by the load: attention, awareness and the role of perceptual load. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014; 369(1641):20130205. PMC: 3965161. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0205. View

5.
Lavie N . Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(2):75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004. View