Twenty Years of Load Theory-Where Are We Now, and Where Should We Go Next?

Overview

Journal Psychon Bull Rev

Specialty Psychology

Date 2016 Jan 6

PMID 26728138

Citations 48

Authors

Gillian Murphy

John A Groeger

Ciara M Greene

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Selective attention allows us to ignore what is task-irrelevant and focus on what is task-relevant. The cognitive and neural mechanisms that underlie this process are key topics of investigation in cognitive psychology. One of the more prominent theories of attention is perceptual load theory, which suggests that the efficiency of selective attention is dependent on both perceptual and cognitive load. It is now more than 20 years since the proposal of load theory, and it is a good time to evaluate the evidence in support of this influential model. The present article supplements and extends previous reviews (Lavie, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004 , 2005, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 143-148. doi: 10.1177/0963721410370295 , 2010) by examining more recent research in what appears to be a rapidly expanding area. The article comprises five parts, examining (1) evidence for the effects of perceptual load on attention, (2) cognitive load, (3) individual differences under load, (4) alternative theories and criticisms, and (5) the future of load theory. We argue that the key next step for load theory will be the application of the model to real-world tasks. The potential benefits of applied attention research are numerous, and there is tentative evidence that applied research would provide strong support for the theory itself, as well as real-world benefits related to activities in which attention is crucial, such as driving and education.

Citing Articles

Better than expected performance effect depends on the spatial location of visual stimulus.

Majidpour S, Sanayei M, Ebrahimpour R, Zabbah S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):281.

PMID: 39747276 PMC: 11696722. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82146-8.

Spatial selective auditory attention is preserved in older age but is degraded by peripheral hearing loss.

Caso A, Griffiths T, Holmes E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26243.

PMID: 39482327 PMC: 11527878. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77102-5.

The interplay of perceptual processing demands and practice in modulating voluntary and involuntary motor responses.

Marinovic W, Nguyen A, Vallence A, Tresilian J, Lipp O Psychophysiology. 2024; 61(12):e14672.

PMID: 39154364 PMC: 11579236. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14672.

Reexamining models of early learning in the digital age: Applications for learning in the wild.

Barr R, Kirkorian H J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2024; 12(4):457-472.

PMID: 38223884 PMC: 10783145. DOI: 10.1037/mac0000132.

The Unconscious Tug-of-War: Exploring the Effect of Stimulus Selection Bias on Creative Problem Solving with Multiple Unconscious Stimuli.

Liu C, Tu S, Gong S, Guan J, Shi Z, Chen Y Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023; 16:3987-4002.

PMID: 37790727 PMC: 10544007. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S420942.

References

Jenkins R, Lavie N, Driver J . Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005; 12(2):314-20. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196378. View

OConnor D, Fukui M, Pinsk M, Kastner S . Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(11):1203-9. DOI: 10.1038/nn957. View

Couperus J . Perceptual load influences selective attention across development. Dev Psychol. 2011; 47(5):1431-9. DOI: 10.1037/a0024027. View

Sy J, Guerin S, Stegman A, Giesbrecht B . Accurate expectancies diminish perceptual distraction during visual search. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:334. PMC: 4034704. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00334. View

Xu J, Monterosso J, Kober H, Balodis I, Potenza M . Perceptual load-dependent neural correlates of distractor interference inhibition. PLoS One. 2011; 6(1):e14552. PMC: 3022587. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014552. View

Gauthier I, Skudlarski P, Gore J, Anderson A . Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(2):191-7. DOI: 10.1038/72140. View

Wiggett A, Pritchard I, Downing P . Animate and inanimate objects in human visual cortex: Evidence for task-independent category effects. Neuropsychologia. 2009; 47(14):3111-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.008. View

Lavie N . Visual feature integration and focused attention: response competition from multiple distractor features. Percept Psychophys. 1997; 59(4):543-56. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211863. View

Briggs F, Usrey W . Corticogeniculate feedback and visual processing in the primate. J Physiol. 2010; 589(Pt 1):33-40. PMC: 3039257. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.193599. View

10.

Cosman J, Vecera S . Object-based attention overrides perceptual load to modulate visual distraction. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(3):576-9. PMC: 3924541. DOI: 10.1037/a0027406. View

11.

Lavie N, Beck D, Konstantinou N . Blinded by the load: attention, awareness and the role of perceptual load. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014; 369(1641):20130205. PMC: 3965161. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0205. View

12.

de Fockert J, Rees G, Frith C, Lavie N . The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science. 2001; 291(5509):1803-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1056496. View

13.

Ducato M, Thomas P, Monestes J, Despretz P, Boucart M . Attentional capture in schizophrenia and schizotypy: effect of attentional load. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2008; 13(2):89-111. DOI: 10.1080/13546800701707371. View

14.

Hessels R, Hooge I, Snijders T, Kemner C . Is there a limit to the superiority of individuals with ASD in visual search?. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013; 44(2):443-51. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-013-1886-8. View

15.

Mothes-Lasch M, Miltner W, Straube T . Processing of angry voices is modulated by visual load. Neuroimage. 2012; 63(1):485-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.005. View

16.

Lavie N . Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(2):75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004. View

17.

Driver J . A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. Br J Psychol. 2001; 92(Pt 1):53-78. View

18.

Carmel D, Fairnie J, Lavie N . Weight and see: loading working memory improves incidental identification of irrelevant faces. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:286. PMC: 3419462. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00286. View

19.

Tellinghuisen D, Nowak E . The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load. Percept Psychophys. 2003; 65(5):817-28. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194817. View

20.

Lavie N, Fox E . The role of perceptual load in negative priming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000; 26(3):1038-52. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.3.1038. View