» Articles » PMID: 16082812

Recognition Memory for Distractor Faces Depends on Attentional Load at Exposure

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2005 Aug 9
PMID 16082812
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Incidental recognition memory for faces previously exposed as task-irrelevant distractors was assessed as a function of the attentional load of an unrelated task performed on superimposed letter strings at exposure. In Experiment 1, subjects were told to ignore the faces and either to judge the color of the letters (low load) or to search for an angular target letter among other angular letters (high load). A surprise recognition memory test revealed that despite the irrelevance of all faces at exposure, those exposed under low-load conditions were later recognized, but those exposed under high-load conditions were not. Experiment 2 found a similar pattern when both the high- and low-load tasks required shape judgments for the letters but made differing attentional demands. Finally, Experiment 3 showed that high load in a nonface task can significantly reduce even immediate recognition of a fixated face from the preceding trial. These results demonstrate that load in a nonface domain (e.g., letter shape) can reduce face recognition, in accord with Lavie's load theory. In addition to their theoretical impact, these results may have practical implications for eyewitness testimony.

Citing Articles

Queues, crowds, and angry mobs: Face identification under distraction in a virtual airport.

Fysh M, Baker E, Rockett J, Allen J, McCall C, Burton A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 77(6):1169-1178.

PMID: 37715668 PMC: 11103907. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231203939.


Attentional attenuation (rather than attentional boost) through task switching leads to a selective long-term memory decline.

Muhmenthaler M, Meier B Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1027871.

PMID: 36337504 PMC: 9632427. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027871.


Your face scares me: Effects of Perceptual load and Social Anxiety on processing of threatening and neutral faces.

Theodorou M, Konstantinou N, Panayiotou G PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0248733.

PMID: 33760893 PMC: 7990234. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248733.


Computational modelling of attentional bias towards threat in paediatric anxiety.

Thompson A, Steinbeis N Dev Sci. 2020; 24(3):e13055.

PMID: 33098719 PMC: 8244064. DOI: 10.1111/desc.13055.


Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.

Bell R, Mieth L, Roer J, Buchner A Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):10185.

PMID: 31308413 PMC: 6629691. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46641-7.


References
1.
Wells G . What do we know about eyewitness identification?. Am Psychol. 1993; 48(5):553-71; discussion 572-80. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.48.5.553. View

2.
Wells G, Malpass R, Lindsay R, Fisher R, Turtle J, Fulero S . From the lab to the police station. A successful application of eyewitness research. Am Psychol. 2000; 55(6):581-98. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.6.581. View

3.
Kellogg R, Cocklin T, BOURNE Jr L . Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory. Am J Psychol. 1982; 95(2):183-98. View

4.
Kanwisher N . Domain specificity in face perception. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(8):759-63. DOI: 10.1038/77664. View

5.
Gardiner J, Parkin A . Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory. Mem Cognit. 1990; 18(6):579-83. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197100. View