» Articles » PMID: 21779254

Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2011 Jul 23
PMID 21779254
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In an event related potential (ERP) experiment using written language materials only, we investigated a potential modulation of the N400 by the modality switch effect. The modality switch effect occurs when a first sentence, describing a fact grounded in one modality, is followed by a second sentence describing a second fact grounded in a different modality. For example, "A cellar is dark" (visual), was preceded by either another visual property "Ham is pink" or by a tactile property "A mitten is soft." We also investigated whether the modality switch effect occurs for false sentences ("A cellar is light"). We found that, for true sentences, the ERP at the critical word "dark" elicited a significantly greater frontal, early N400-like effect (270-370 ms) when there was a modality mismatch than when there was a modality-match. This pattern was not found for the critical word "light" in false sentences. Results similar to the frontal negativity were obtained in a late time window (500-700 ms). The obtained ERP effect is similar to one previously obtained for pictures. We conclude that in this paradigm we obtained fast access to conceptual properties for modality-matched pairs, which leads to embodiment effects similar to those previously obtained with pictorial stimuli.

Citing Articles

Embodied Processing at Six Linguistic Granularity Levels: A Consensus Paper.

Korner A, Castillo M, Drijvers L, Fischer M, Gunther F, Marelli M J Cogn. 2023; 6(1):60.

PMID: 37841668 PMC: 10573585. DOI: 10.5334/joc.231.


The cross-linguistic comparison of perceptual strength norms for Korean, English and L2 English.

Lee J, Shin J Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1188909.

PMID: 37538997 PMC: 10395129. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1188909.


The Multilevel Modality-Switch Effect: What Happens When We See the Bees Buzzing and Hear the Diamonds Glistening.

Scerrati E, Lugli L, Nicoletti R, Borghi A Psychon Bull Rev. 2016; 24(3):798-803.

PMID: 27542801 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1150-2.


The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing.

Schaeffner S, Koch I, Philipp A Psychol Res. 2015; 80(2):212-23.

PMID: 25813198 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0661-1.


How vertical hand movements impact brain activity elicited by literally and metaphorically related words: an ERP study of embodied metaphor.

Bardolph M, Coulson S Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 8:1031.

PMID: 25566041 PMC: 4274969. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01031.


References
1.
Zwaan R, Stanfield R, Yaxley R . Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychol Sci. 2002; 13(2):168-71. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00430. View

2.
Van Petten C . Words and sentences: event-related brain potential measures. Psychophysiology. 1995; 32(6):511-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01228.x. View

3.
van Elk M, van Schie H, Bekkering H . The N400-concreteness effect reflects the retrieval of semantic information during the preparation of meaningful actions. Biol Psychol. 2010; 85(1):134-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.06.004. View

4.
Barsalou L . Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 364(1521):1281-9. PMC: 2666716. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0319. View

5.
Fischler I, Bloom P, Childers D, Roucos S, PERRY Jr N . Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. Psychophysiology. 1983; 20(4):400-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb00920.x. View