» Articles » PMID: 27513929

Serum-Based Quantification of MYCN Gene Amplification in Young Patients with Neuroblastoma: Potential Utility As a Surrogate Biomarker for Neuroblastoma

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Aug 12
PMID 27513929
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We previously developed a method for determining MYCN gene amplification status using cell-free DNA fragments released from cancer cells into the blood of patients with neuroblastoma (NB). Here, we analyzed the relationship between MYCN amplification (MNA) status and neuroblastoma prognosis. We screened serum samples from 151 patients with NB for MNA, using real-time quantitative PCR, and compared the results with MYCN status determined using paired tumor samples. We additionally investigated whether MNA status correlates with patient survival. When a cut-off value of 5 was used, serum-based MNA analysis was found to show good sensitivity (86%) and very high specificity (95%). The sensitivities for stage 1 and 2 might be acceptable, even though it is not as good as for stage 3 and 4 (67% for stage 1 and 2, 92% for stage 3, and 87% for stage 4). MNA status correlated with overall survival in our cohort of 82 patients, with survival data available (p < 0.01). The hazard ratio of MNA status was 4.98 in patients diagnosed at less than 18 months of age (95% confidence interval, 1.00-24.78), and 1.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-3.14) for those diagnosed at 18 months of age or older. Serum-based MNA analysis is rapid and non-invasive compared with tumor-based MNA analysis, and has potential to predict tumor MNA status. There is still a room to improve the sensitivity of the test for tumors of stages 1 and 2, nonetheless this assay might help to determine therapeutic strategies prior to tumor biopsy, especially for patients with a life-threatening condition, as well as for patients of less than 18 months of age whose risk-grouping and treatment allocation depends on their MNA status.

Citing Articles

A comprehensive overview of liquid biopsy applications in pediatric solid tumors.

Janssen F, Lak N, Janda C, Kester L, Meister M, Merks J NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024; 8(1):172.

PMID: 39097671 PMC: 11297996. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00657-z.


Advances in liquid biopsy in neuroblastoma.

Zhuo Z, Lin L, Miao L, Li M, He J Fundam Res. 2024; 2(6):903-917.

PMID: 38933377 PMC: 11197818. DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.08.005.


Circulating Cell-Free Tumor Deoxyribonucleic Acid Analysis as a Tool for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Pediatric Solid Tumors.

Zaninovic L, Baskovic M, Bojanac A, Jezek D Turk Arch Pediatr. 2023; 58(3):241-249.

PMID: 37144257 PMC: 10210601. DOI: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2023.23014.


Longitudinal evaluation of serum microRNAs as biomarkers for neuroblastoma burden and therapeutic p53 reactivation.

Van Goethem A, Deleu J, Yigit N, Everaert C, Moreno-Smith M, Vasudevan S NAR Cancer. 2023; 5(1):zcad002.

PMID: 36683916 PMC: 9846426. DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcad002.


Extracellular Vesicle-Based Method for Detecting Amplification Status of Pediatric Neuroblastoma.

Panachan J, Rojsirikulchai N, Pongsakul N, Khowawisetsut L, Pongphitcha P, Siriboonpiputtana T Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(11).

PMID: 35681607 PMC: 9179557. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112627.


References
1.
Attiyeh E, London W, Mosse Y, Wang Q, Winter C, Khazi D . Chromosome 1p and 11q deletions and outcome in neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(21):2243-53. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa052399. View

2.
Woods W, Tuchman M, Robison L, Bernstein M, Leclerc J, Brisson L . A population-based study of the usefulness of screening for neuroblastoma. Lancet. 1996; 348(9043):1682-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)06020-5. View

3.
Ohira M, Oba S, Nakamura Y, Isogai E, Kaneko S, Nakagawa A . Expression profiling using a tumor-specific cDNA microarray predicts the prognosis of intermediate risk neuroblastomas. Cancer Cell. 2005; 7(4):337-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.019. View

4.
Sawada T, Shikata T, Matsumura T, Kawakatsu H, Sugimoto T . Analysis of 598 cases of neuroblastoma (NB) detected by screening and changes in the age distribution and incidence of NB patients after mass screening in infants in Japan. NB Screening Study Group. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1994; 385:371-5. View

5.
Schilling F, Erttmann R, Ambros P, Strehl S, Christiansen H, Kovar H . Screening for neuroblastoma. Lancet. 1994; 344(8930):1157-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90665-3. View