» Articles » PMID: 27484800

Ligand-induced Epitope Masking: DISSOCIATION OF INTEGRIN α5β1-FIBRONECTIN COMPLEXES ONLY BY MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES WITH AN ALLOSTERIC MODE OF ACTION

Overview
Journal J Biol Chem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2016 Aug 4
PMID 27484800
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We previously demonstrated that Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)-containing ligand-mimetic inhibitors of integrins are unable to dissociate pre-formed integrin-fibronectin complexes (IFCs). These observations suggested that amino acid residues involved in integrin-fibronectin binding become obscured in the ligand-occupied state. Because the epitopes of some function-blocking anti-integrin monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) lie near the ligand-binding pocket, it follows that the epitopes of these mAbs may become shielded in the ligand-occupied state. Here, we tested whether function-blocking mAbs directed against α5β1 can interact with the integrin after it forms a complex with an RGD-containing fragment of fibronectin. We showed that the anti-α5 subunit mAbs JBS5, SNAKA52, 16, and P1D6 failed to disrupt IFCs and hence appeared unable to bind to the ligand-occupied state. In contrast, the allosteric anti-β1 subunit mAbs 13, 4B4, and AIIB2 could dissociate IFCs and therefore were able to interact with the ligand-bound state. However, another class of function-blocking anti-β1 mAbs, exemplified by Lia1/2, could not disrupt IFCs. This second class of mAbs was also distinguished from 13, 4B4, and AIIB2 by their ability to induce homotypic cell aggregation. Although the epitope of Lia1/2 was closely overlapping with those of 13, 4B4, and AIIB2, it appeared to lie closer to the ligand-binding pocket. A new model of the α5β1-fibronectin complex supports our hypothesis that the epitopes of mAbs that fail to bind to the ligand-occupied state lie within, or very close to, the integrin-fibronectin interface. Importantly, our findings imply that the efficacy of some therapeutic anti-integrin mAbs could be limited by epitope masking.

Citing Articles

Cas phosphorylation regulates focal adhesion assembly.

Kumar S, Stainer A, Dubrulle J, Simpkins C, Cooper J Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37489578 PMC: 10435235. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.90234.


CD9 co-operation with syndecan-1 is required for a major staphylococcal adhesion pathway.

Green L, Issa R, Albaldi F, Urwin L, Thompson R, Khalid H mBio. 2023; 14(4):e0148223.

PMID: 37486132 PMC: 10470606. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01482-23.


New Therapeutic Targets for Hepatic Fibrosis in the Integrin Family, α8β1 and α11β1, Induced Specifically on Activated Stellate Cells.

Yokosaki Y, Nishimichi N Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(23).

PMID: 34884600 PMC: 8657911. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312794.


Low-affinity integrin states have faster ligand-binding kinetics than the high-affinity state.

Li J, Yan J, Springer T Elife. 2021; 10.

PMID: 34854380 PMC: 8730728. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.73359.


Cell surface integrin α5ß1 clustering negatively regulates receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in colorectal cancer cells via glycogen synthase kinase 3.

Starchenko A, Graves-Deal R, Brubaker D, Li C, Yang Y, Singh B Integr Biol (Camb). 2021; 13(6):153-166.

PMID: 34037774 PMC: 8204629. DOI: 10.1093/intbio/zyab009.


References
1.
Cherry L, Yunker N, Lambert E, Vaughan D, Lowe D . Vedolizumab: an α4β7 integrin antagonist for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2015; 6(5):224-33. PMC: 4549690. DOI: 10.1177/2040622315586970. View

2.
Mould A, Barton S, Askari J, McEwan P, Buckley P, Craig S . Conformational changes in the integrin beta A domain provide a mechanism for signal transduction via hybrid domain movement. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(19):17028-35. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M213139200. View

3.
Beglova N, Blacklow S, Takagi J, Springer T . Cysteine-rich module structure reveals a fulcrum for integrin rearrangement upon activation. Nat Struct Biol. 2002; 9(4):282-7. DOI: 10.1038/nsb779. View

4.
Pike K, Kulkarni S, Pawson T . Immature T-cell clustering and efficient differentiation require the polarity protein Scribble. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 108(3):1116-21. PMC: 3024664. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018224108. View

5.
Yu Y, Schurpf T, Springer T . How natalizumab binds and antagonizes α4 integrins. J Biol Chem. 2013; 288(45):32314-32325. PMC: 3820868. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.501668. View