» Articles » PMID: 27472368

Reliability and Variability of TDCS Induced Changes in the Lower Limb Motor Cortex

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2016 Jul 30
PMID 27472368
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is emerging as a promising adjuvant to enhance motor function. However, there has been increasing reservations about the reliability and variability of the neuromodulatory effects evoked by tDCS.

Objective/hypothesis: The main purpose of this study was to explore the test-retest reliability and inter-individual variability of tDCS of the lower limb M1 and the relationship between transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-related measures and tDCS-induced changes.

Methods: Fifteen healthy participants received anodal tDCS of the lower limb M1 either when performing a lower limb motor task or when the limb was at rest. Each condition was tested twice. tDCS induced changes in corticomotor excitability of the tibialis anterior muscle were measured using TMS. A repeated measures ANOVA was performed to examine efficacy of tDCS between the two task conditions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and variance component analyses were performed to examine reliability and variability respectively.

Results: A significant increase in in corticomotor excitability was noted for the tDCS-task condition at 140% active motor threshold (AMT) and when comparing recruitment curve slopes, but not at 120% and 130% AMT. Overall, ICC values between testing days for each stimulation condition ranged from 0.6-0.9. Higher ICCs were seen for higher TMS intensities (140% AMT) and recruitment curve slopes. Inter-individual variability contributed to 34% of the exhibited variance.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that the TMS-related measure used to assess neuromodulation after tDCS has an effect on its perceived test-retest reliability and inter-individual variability. Importantly, we noticed that a high reliability and low variability does not necessarily indicate clinical efficacy of tDCS as some participants showed little to no modulation of corticomotor excitability consistently.

Citing Articles

Effects of active and sham tDCS on the soleus H-reflex during standing.

McCane L, Wolpaw J, Thompson A Exp Brain Res. 2023; 241(6):1611-1622.

PMID: 37145136 PMC: 10224818. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06624-7.


A randomized sham-controlled trial on the effects of dual-tDCS "during" physical therapy on lower limb performance in sub-acute stroke and a comparison to the previous study using a "before" stimulation protocol.

Klomjai W, Aneksan B BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022; 14(1):68.

PMID: 35428346 PMC: 9013129. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-022-00463-9.


Review of tDCS Configurations for Stimulation of the Lower-Limb Area of Motor Cortex and Cerebellum.

Quiles V, Ferrero L, Ianez E, Ortiz M, Azorin J Brain Sci. 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35204011 PMC: 8870282. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020248.


Effects of Combining Online Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Gait Training in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mitsutake T, Imura T, Hori T, Sakamoto M, Tanaka R Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:782305.

PMID: 34955795 PMC: 8708562. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.782305.


Bilateral Motor Cortex tDCS Effects on Post-Stroke Pain and Spasticity: A Three Cases Study.

Molero-Chamizo A, Salas Sanchez A, Alvarez Batista B, Cordero Garcia C, Andujar Barroso R, Rivera-Urbina G Front Pharmacol. 2021; 12:624582.

PMID: 33967758 PMC: 8098051. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.624582.


References
1.
Alonzo A, Brassil J, Taylor J, Martin D, Loo C . Daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) leads to greater increases in cortical excitability than second daily transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2011; 5(3):208-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.04.006. View

2.
Nitsche M, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W . Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003; 15(4):619-26. DOI: 10.1162/089892903321662994. View

3.
Bartko J . The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966; 19(1):3-11. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3. View

4.
Stagg C, Jayaram G, Pastor D, Kincses Z, Matthews P, Johansen-Berg H . Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(5):800-804. PMC: 3083512. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.009. View

5.
Horvath J, Carter O, Forte J . Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be). Front Syst Neurosci. 2014; 8:2. PMC: 3901383. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00002. View