Noninvasive Cortical Stimulation Enhances Motor Skill Acquisition over Multiple Days Through an Effect on Consolidation

Overview

Journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Specialty Science

Date 2009 Jan 24

PMID 19164589

Citations 549

Authors

Janine Reis

Heidi M Schambra

Leonardo G Cohen

Ethan R Buch

Brita Fritsch

Eric Zarahn

Pablo A Celnik

John W Krakauer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Motor skills can take weeks to months to acquire and can diminish over time in the absence of continued practice. Thus, strategies that enhance skill acquisition or retention are of great scientific and practical interest. Here we investigated the effect of noninvasive cortical stimulation on the extended time course of learning a novel and challenging motor skill task. A skill measure was chosen to reflect shifts in the task's speed-accuracy tradeoff function (SAF), which prevented us from falsely interpreting variations in position along an unchanged SAF as a change in skill. Subjects practiced over 5 consecutive days while receiving transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1). Using the skill measure, we assessed the impact of anodal (relative to sham) tDCS on both within-day (online) and between-day (offline) effects and on the rate of forgetting during a 3-month follow-up (long-term retention). There was greater total (online plus offline) skill acquisition with anodal tDCS compared to sham, which was mediated through a selective enhancement of offline effects. Anodal tDCS did not change the rate of forgetting relative to sham across the 3-month follow-up period, and consequently the skill measure remained greater with anodal tDCS at 3 months. This prolonged enhancement may hold promise for the rehabilitation of brain injury. Furthermore, these findings support the existence of a consolidation mechanism, susceptible to anodal tDCS, which contributes to offline effects but not to online effects or long-term retention.

Citing Articles

Application of bilateral tDCS over left and right M1 produces asymmetric training and retention effects when learning a rhythmic bimanual task.

McCulloch A, Wright D, Buchanan J Exp Brain Res. 2025; 243(4):91.

PMID: 40085241 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-025-07045-4.

Implicit Motor Learning Under Anodal or Cathodal tDCS During fMRI Induces Partially Distinct Network Responses.

Hamzei F, Ritter A, Gullmar D Eur J Neurosci. 2025; 61(5):e70053.

PMID: 40075554 PMC: 11903934. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.70053.

Combined effects and timing of robotic training and botulinum toxin on upper limb spasticity and motor function: a single‑blinded randomized controlled pilot study.

Shin J, Park G, Kim H, Cho D, Kwon S J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):50.

PMID: 40050906 PMC: 11884042. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01584-1.

Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation on cognitive function in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ma S, Zhuang W, Wang X, Zhang D, Wang H, Han Q Front Aging Neurosci. 2025; 17:1495492.

PMID: 40046783 PMC: 11880240. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1495492.

EEG connectivity and BDNF correlates of fast motor learning in laparoscopic surgery.

Omurtag A, Sunderland C, Mansfield N, Zakeri Z Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7399.

PMID: 40032953 PMC: 11876304. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89261-0.

References

Sternberg S . Process decomposition from double dissociation of subprocesses. Cortex. 2003; 39(1):180-2. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70097-2. View

Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Sole J, Wassermann E, Hallett M . Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain. 1994; 117 ( Pt 4):847-58. DOI: 10.1093/brain/117.4.847. View

Vines B, Nair D, Schlaug G . Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport. 2006; 17(6):671-4. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200604240-00023. View

Friedman D, Donoghue J . Learning-induced LTP in neocortex. Science. 2000; 290(5491):533-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5491.533. View

Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams M, Turner R, Ungerleider L . Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature. 1995; 377(6545):155-8. DOI: 10.1038/377155a0. View

Richardson A, Overduin S, Valero-Cabre A, Padoa-Schioppa C, Pascual-Leone A, Bizzi E . Disruption of primary motor cortex before learning impairs memory of movement dynamics. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(48):12466-70. PMC: 6674906. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1139-06.2006. View

Luft A, Buitrago M, Ringer T, Dichgans J, Schulz J . Motor skill learning depends on protein synthesis in motor cortex after training. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(29):6515-20. PMC: 6729880. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1034-04.2004. View

Hikosaka O, Nakamura K, Sakai K, Nakahara H . Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002; 12(2):217-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00307-0. View

Ghilardi M, Ghez C, Dhawan V, Moeller J, Mentis M, Nakamura T . Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning. Brain Res. 2000; 871(1):127-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02365-9. View

10.

Rosenkranz K, Nitsche M, Tergau F, Paulus W . Diminution of training-induced transient motor cortex plasticity by weak transcranial direct current stimulation in the human. Neurosci Lett. 2000; 296(1):61-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01621-9. View

11.

Antal A, Nitsche M, Kincses T, Kruse W, Hoffmann K, Paulus W . Facilitation of visuo-motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2004; 19(10):2888-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03367.x. View

12.

Catalano J . The effect of rest following massed practice of continuous and discrete motor tasks. J Mot Behav. 1978; 10(1):63-7. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1978.10735136. View

13.

Baraduc P, Lang N, Rothwell J, Wolpert D . Consolidation of dynamic motor learning is not disrupted by rTMS of primary motor cortex. Curr Biol. 2004; 14(3):252-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.033. View

14.

Adams J . Warm-up decrement in performance on the pursuit-rotor. Am J Psychol. 1952; 65(3):404-14. View

15.

Krakauer J, Shadmehr R . Consolidation of motor memory. Trends Neurosci. 2005; 29(1):58-64. PMC: 2553888. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2005.10.003. View

16.

BINDMAN L, Lippold O, REDFEARN J . Long-lasting changes in the level of the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex produced bypolarizing currents. Nature. 1962; 196:584-5. DOI: 10.1038/196584a0. View

17.

Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams M, Turner R, Ungerleider L . The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(3):861-8. PMC: 33809. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.861. View

18.

Anshel M . Examining warm-up decrement as a function of interpolated open and closed motor tasks: implications for practice strategies. J Sports Sci. 1995; 13(3):247-56. DOI: 10.1080/02640419508732234. View

19.

Boggio P, Castro L, Savagim E, Braite R, Cruz V, Rocha R . Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 2006; 404(1-2):232-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.05.051. View

20.

Savion-Lemieux T, Penhune V . The effects of practice and delay on motor skill learning and retention. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 161(4):423-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2085-9. View