» Articles » PMID: 27468142

Race and Sex Differences in Management and Outcomes of Patients After ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarct: Results From the NCDR

Overview
Journal Clin Cardiol
Date 2016 Jul 29
PMID 27468142
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Race and sex have been shown to affect management of myocardial infarction (MI); however, it is unclear if such disparities exist in contemporary care of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

Hypothesis: Disparities in care will be less prevalent in more heavily protocol-driven management of STEMI than the less algorithmic care of NSTEMI.

Methods: Data were collected from the ACTION Registry-GWTG database to assess care differences related to race and sex of patients presenting with NSTEMI or STEMI. For key treatments and outcomes, adjustments were made including patient demographics, baseline comorbidities, and markers of socioeconomic status.

Results: Key demographic variables demonstrate significant differences in baseline comorbidities; black patients had higher incidences of hypertension and diabetes, and women more frequently had diabetes. With few exceptions, rates of acute and discharge medical therapy were similar by race in any sex category in both STEMI and NSTEMI populations. Rates of catheterization were similar by race for STEMI but not for NSTEMI, where both black men and women had lower rates of invasive therapy. Rates of revascularization were significantly lower for black patients in both the STEMI and NSTEMI groups regardless of sex. Rates of adverse events differed by sex, with disparities for death and major bleeding; after adjustment, rates were similar by race within sex comparisons.

Conclusions: In this contemporary cohort, although there are differences by race in presentation and management of MI, heavily protocol-driven processes seem to show fewer racial disparities.

Citing Articles

Identification of Gender Differences in Acute Myocardial Infarction Presentation and Management at Aga Khan University Hospital-Pakistan: Natural Language Processing Application in a Dataset of Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.

Ngaruiya C, Samad Z, Tajuddin S, Nasim Z, Leff R, Farhad A JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e42774.

PMID: 39705071 PMC: 11699486. DOI: 10.2196/42774.


Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Outcomes After a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Capable Facility Opening by Patient Race and Community Segregation.

Shen Y, Feldmeier M, Hsia R J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(22):e035853.

PMID: 39503292 PMC: 11681415. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035853.


Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Nationally Representative Sample.

Srivastava G, Alhuneafat L, Jabri A, Omar Y, Abdolall A, Beleny D J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 1(6):100451.

PMID: 39132342 PMC: 11307933. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100451.


Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Epidemiological Trends of Patients Admitted With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.

Rogers E, Torres C, Rao S, Donatelle M, Beohar N J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 1(5):100395.

PMID: 39131460 PMC: 11307827. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100395.


Impact of aspirin dose according to race in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a secondary analysis of the ADAPTABLE randomised controlled trial.

Marquis-Gravel G, Mulder H, Wruck L, Benziger C, Effron M, Farrehi P BMJ Open. 2024; 14(8):e078197.

PMID: 39117415 PMC: 11407226. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078197.


References
1.
Eisenberg J . Sociologic influences on decision-making by clinicians. Ann Intern Med. 1979; 90(6):957-64. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-90-6-957. View

2.
Anstey D, Li S, Thomas L, Wang T, Wiviott S . Race and Sex Differences in Management and Outcomes of Patients After ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarct: Results From the NCDR. Clin Cardiol. 2016; 39(10):585-595. PMC: 6490713. DOI: 10.1002/clc.22570. View

3.
Peterson E, Roe M, Rumsfeld J, Shaw R, Brindis R, Fonarow G . A call to ACTION (acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network): a national effort to promote timely clinical feedback and support continuous quality improvement for acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009; 2(5):491-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.847145. View

4.
Peterson E, Shah B, Parsons L, Pollack Jr C, French W, Canto J . Trends in quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Heart J. 2008; 156(6):1045-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.07.028. View

5.
Chin C, Chen A, Wang T, Alexander K, Mathews R, Rumsfeld J . Risk adjustment for in-hospital mortality of contemporary patients with acute myocardial infarction: the acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network (ACTION) registry-get with the guidelines (GWTG) acute myocardial infarction.... Am Heart J. 2010; 161(1):113-122.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.004. View