» Articles » PMID: 21167342

Risk Adjustment for In-hospital Mortality of Contemporary Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network (ACTION) Registry-get with the Guidelines (GWTG) Acute Myocardial Infarction...

Overview
Journal Am Heart J
Date 2010 Dec 21
PMID 21167342
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: accurate risk adjustment is needed to guide quality improvement initiatives and research to improve care of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). We developed and validated a model to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality for contemporary patients with acute MI treated in routine clinical practice.

Methods: the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network (ACTION) Registry-Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) database of patients with acute MI was used to derive (n = 65,668 from 248 US sites) and validate (n = 16,336) a multivariable logistic regression model to predict the likelihood of in-hospital mortality (4.9% in each cohort).

Results: factors with the highest independent significance in terms of mortality prediction included age, baseline serum creatinine, systolic blood pressure, troponin elevation, heart failure and/or cardiogenic shock at presentation, ST-segment changes, heart rate, and prior peripheral arterial disease. The model showed very good discrimination, with c statistics of 0.85 and 0.84 in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The model calibrated well overall and in key patient subgroups including males versus females, age <75 versus ≥ 75 years, diabetes versus no diabetes, and ST-elevation MI versus non-ST-elevation MI. The ACTION Registry-GWTG in-hospital mortality risk score was also developed from the model. Patients with a risk score of ≤ 40 had an observed mortality rate of <4% compared with those with a risk score of 41-50 (12%) and risk scores >50 (34%).

Conclusion: the ACTION Registry-GWTG™ in-hospital mortality model and risk score represent simple, accurate risk adjustment tools for contemporary patients with acute MI.

Citing Articles

Performance of the Risk Scores for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Chinese Cohort.

Bai L, Li Y, Yang B, Cheng Y, Zhang Y, Liao G Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(12):356.

PMID: 39077082 PMC: 11272866. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2412356.


Implications of a Race Term in GFR Estimates Used to Predict AKI After Coronary Intervention.

Uzendu A, Kennedy K, Chertow G, Amin A, Giri J, Rymer J JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023; 16(18):2309-2320.

PMID: 37758386 PMC: 10795279. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.07.031.


Identification of Low- versus High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome for a Selective ECG Monitoring Strategy.

Akodad M, Meunier P, Padovani C, Cayla G, Zitouni W, Macia J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(14).

PMID: 37510718 PMC: 10380550. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144604.


Central arterial pressure predicts in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study.

Zhang L, Wang Z, Lu X, Gan F Ann Transl Med. 2023; 11(5):214.

PMID: 37007547 PMC: 10061456. DOI: 10.21037/atm-23-1079.


Use of machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Li R, Shen L, Ma W, Yan B, Chen W, Zhu J Clin Cardiol. 2022; 46(2):184-194.

PMID: 36479714 PMC: 9933107. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23957.