» Articles » PMID: 27422018

Temporal Binding Within and Across Events

Overview
Date 2016 Jul 17
PMID 27422018
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Remembering the order in which events occur is a fundamental component of episodic memory. However, the neural mechanisms supporting serial recall remain unclear. Behaviorally, serial recall is greater for information encountered within the same event compared to across event boundaries, raising the possibility that contextual stability may modulate the cognitive and neural processes supporting serial encoding. In the present study, we used fMRI during the encoding of consecutive face and object stimuli to elucidate the neural encoding signatures supporting subsequent serial recall behavior both within and across events. We found that univariate BOLD activation in both the middle hippocampus and left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) was associated with subsequent serial recall of items that occur across event boundaries. By contrast, successful serial encoding within events was associated with increased functional connectivity between the hippocampus and ventromedial PFC, but not with univariate activation in these or other regions. These findings build on evidence implicating hippocampal and PFC processes in encoding temporal aspects of memory. They further suggest that these encoding processes are influenced by whether binding occurs within a stable context or bridges two adjacent but distinct events.

Citing Articles

Improving vulnerable Calbindin1 neurons in the ventral hippocampus rescues tau-induced impairment of episodic memory.

Lei H, Lv J, Zhang F, Wei L, Shi K, Liu J Transl Neurodegener. 2025; 14(1):12.

PMID: 40038800 PMC: 11877784. DOI: 10.1186/s40035-025-00473-w.


Fast-timescale hippocampal processes bridge between slowly unfurling neocortical states during memory search.

Michelmann S, Dugan P, Doyle W, Friedman D, Melloni L, Strauss C bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990462 PMC: 11844493. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.11.637471.


Schemas, reinforcement learning and the medial prefrontal cortex.

Bein O, Niv Y Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025; 26(3):141-157.

PMID: 39775183 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-024-00893-z.


Large language models can segment narrative events similarly to humans.

Michelmann S, Kumar M, Norman K, Toneva M Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(1):39.

PMID: 39751673 PMC: 11810054. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02569-z.


Deconstructing and reconstructing turn-taking in caregiver-infant interactions: a platform for embodied models of early cooperation.

Sagar M, Henderson A, Takac M, Morrison S, Knott A, Moser A J R Soc N Z. 2024; 53(1):148-168.

PMID: 39439989 PMC: 11459835. DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2022.2098781.


References
1.
Chein J, Fiez J . Dissociation of verbal working memory system components using a delayed serial recall task. Cereb Cortex. 2001; 11(11):1003-14. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/11.11.1003. View

2.
Strange B, Otten L, Josephs O, Rugg M, Dolan R . Dissociable human perirhinal, hippocampal, and parahippocampal roles during verbal encoding. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(2):523-8. PMC: 6758661. View

3.
Schott B, Sellner D, Lauer C, Habib R, Frey J, Guderian S . Activation of midbrain structures by associative novelty and the formation of explicit memory in humans. Learn Mem. 2004; 11(4):383-7. DOI: 10.1101/lm.75004. View

4.
Brass M, von Cramon D . Selection for cognitive control: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study on the selection of task-relevant information. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(40):8847-52. PMC: 6729959. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2513-04.2004. View

5.
Forstmann B, Brass M, Koch I, von Cramon D . Internally generated and directly cued task sets: an investigation with fMRI. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 43(6):943-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.08.008. View