» Articles » PMID: 17507573

The Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Contributes to Successful Relational Memory Encoding

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2007 May 18
PMID 17507573
Citations 113
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Results from neuroimaging studies of long-term memory (LTM) encoding have contributed to the view that the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) contributes to successful LTM formation, whereas the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) does not. We hypothesized that the DLPFC does contribute to LTM, but under specific circumstances. That is, the DLPFC may be critical for building relationships between items during on-line processing, and this may promote LTM for associations between items. We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test this hypothesis by examining brain activity during sequential encoding of unrelated word pairs. During presentation of the second ("target") word in each pair, subjects either made a semantic judgment specific to the target word ("item-specific" trials), or a semantic judgment that involved a comparison between the target word and the first word in the pair ("relational" trials). Behaviorally, recognition memory for target words was equivalent between the two trial types but associative recognition of studied word pairs was significantly greater for relational trials. fMRI results showed that DLPFC activity was greater during relational compared with item-specific encoding and that DLPFC activity predicted successful memory for associations but not successful item memory. Activity in the VLPFC was also greater for relational compared with item-specific encoding, but VLPFC activation predicted successful memory for both associations and items. These results support the view that the DLPFC may contribute to LTM through its role in active processing of relationships during encoding, whereas the VLPFC may have a more general role in promoting successful LTM formation.

Citing Articles

Functional connectivity patterns in parosmia.

Thaploo D, Joshi A, Yilmaz E, Yildirim D, Altundag A, Hummel T Behav Brain Funct. 2023; 19(1):24.

PMID: 38115149 PMC: 10731743. DOI: 10.1186/s12993-023-00225-8.


Strong but Fragmented Memory of a Stressful Episode.

Grob A, Ehlers D, Schwabe L eNeuro. 2023; 10(9).

PMID: 37640540 PMC: 10484358. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0178-23.2023.


The Interplay of Oxytocin and Attachment in Schizophrenic Patients: An fMRI Study.

Hennig-Fast K, Meissner D, Steuwe C, Dehning S, Blautzik J, Eilert D Brain Sci. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37626482 PMC: 10452454. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13081125.


Effects of prior knowledge on brain activation and functional connectivity during memory retrieval.

Guo D, Chen H, Wang L, Yang J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):13650.

PMID: 37608065 PMC: 10444832. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40966-0.


Pre-associative item encoding influences associative memory: Behavioral and ERP evidence.

Forester G, Kamp S Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023; 23(4):1059-1075.

PMID: 37169996 PMC: 11536394. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-023-01102-7.


References
1.
Amunts K, Schleicher A, Burgel U, Mohlberg H, Uylings H, Zilles K . Broca's region revisited: cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. J Comp Neurol. 1999; 412(2):319-41. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990920)412:2<319::aid-cne10>3.0.co;2-7. View

2.
Postle B, Berger J, DEsposito M . Functional neuroanatomical double dissociation of mnemonic and executive control processes contributing to working memory performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(22):12959-64. PMC: 23182. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12959. View

3.
Desjardins A, Kiehl K, Liddle P . Removal of confounding effects of global signal in functional MRI analyses. Neuroimage. 2001; 13(4):751-8. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0719. View

4.
Wagner A, Clark J, Poldrack R . Recovering meaning: left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval. Neuron. 2001; 31(2):329-38. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00359-2. View

5.
Rorden C, Brett M . Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol. 2001; 12(4):191-200. DOI: 10.1155/2000/421719. View