» Articles » PMID: 27377261

Radiosurgery with Flattening-filter-free Techniques in the Treatment of Brain Metastases : Plan Comparison and Early Clinical Evaluation

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2016 Jul 6
PMID 27377261
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Radiosurgical treatment of brain metastases is well established in daily clinical routine. Utilization of flattening-filter-free beams (FFF) may allow for more rapid delivery of treatment doses and improve clinical comfort. Hence, we compared plan quality and efficiency of radiosurgery in FFF mode to FF techniques.

Materials And Methods: Between November 2014 and June 2015, 21 consecutive patients with 25 brain metastases were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in FFF mode. Brain metastases received dose-fractionation schedules of 1 × 20 Gy or 1 × 18 Gy, delivered to the conformally enclosing 80 % isodose. Three patients with critically localized or large (>3 cm) brain metastases were treated with 6 × 5 Gy. Plan quality and efficiency were evaluated by analyzing conformity, dose gradients, dose to healthy brain tissue, treatment delivery time, and number of monitor units. FFF plans were compared to those using the FF method, and early clinical outcome and toxicity were assessed.

Results: FFF mode resulted in significant reductions in beam-on time (p < 0.001) and mean brain dose (p = 0.001) relative to FF-mode comparison plans. Furthermore, significant improvements in dose gradients and sharper dose falloffs were found for SRS in FFF mode (-1.1 %, -29.6 %; p ≤ 0.003), but conformity was slightly superior in SRS in FF mode (-1.3 %; p = 0.001). With a median follow-up time of 5.1 months, 6‑month overall survival was 63.3 %. Local control was observed in 24 of 25 brain metastases (96 %).

Conclusion: SRS in FFF mode is time efficient and provides similar plan quality with the opportunity of slightly reduced dose exposure to healthy brain tissue when compared to SRS in FF mode. Clinical outcomes appear promising and show only modest treatment-related toxicity.

Citing Articles

Insights into the dosimetric and geometric characteristics of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: A systematic review.

Mukwada G, Chamunyonga C, Rowshanfarzad P, Gill S, Ebert M PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0307088.

PMID: 39121064 PMC: 11315342. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307088.


Overcoming Problems Caused by Offset Distance of Multiple Targets in Single-isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning for Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Ito T, Kubo K, Monzen H, Yanagi Y, Nakamura K, Sakai Y J Med Phys. 2024; 48(4):365-372.

PMID: 38223796 PMC: 10783189. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_8_23.


Dosimetric Parameters in Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Do Flattening Filter-Free Beams Bring Benefits? A Preliminary Study.

Ghemis D, Marcu L Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36765636 PMC: 9913515. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030678.


Comparison between flattening filter-free (FFF) and flattened photon beam VMAT plans for the whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampus sparing.

Ji T, Sun L, Cai F, Li G Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2021; 18(5):e263-e267.

PMID: 34333848 PMC: 9540553. DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13624.


An Experimental Intervention Study Assessing the Impact of a Thin Silicone Gel Surface Overlay on Interface Pressure.

Angmorterh S, England A, Aboagye S, Ofori E, Hogg P Radiol Res Pract. 2020; 2020:3246531.

PMID: 33299607 PMC: 7710438. DOI: 10.1155/2020/3246531.


References
1.
Kocher M, Wittig A, Piroth M, Treuer H, Seegenschmiedt H, Ruge M . Stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases. A report of the DEGRO Working Group on Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol. 2014; 190(6):521-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0648-7. View

2.
Nicolini G, Ghosh-Laskar S, Shrivastava S, Banerjee S, Chaudhary S, Agarwal J . Volumetric modulation arc radiotherapy with flattening filter-free beams compared with static gantry IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer: a feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84(2):553-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.041. View

3.
Hartmann G, Schlegel W, Sturm V, Kober B, Pastyr O, Lorenz W . Cerebral radiation surgery using moving field irradiation at a linear accelerator facility. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985; 11(6):1185-92. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90068-9. View

4.
Wang P, Hsu W, Chung N, Chang F, Jang C, Fogliata A . Feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy and high intensity photon beams for hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Radiat Oncol. 2014; 9:18. PMC: 3940026. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-18. View

5.
Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Shuto T, Akabane A, Higuchi Y, Kawagishi J . Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(4):387-95. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70061-0. View