» Articles » PMID: 27339298

Effect of Outdoor Structural Enrichments on the Performance, Use of Range Area, and Behavior of Organic Meat Chickens

Overview
Journal Poult Sci
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2016 Jun 25
PMID 27339298
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chickens provided with outdoor access often do not fully use the range area. Natural cover, such as trees, can provide shelter and increase range use, but may not be practical for use in all free-range operations. A study was conducted to determine whether constructed enrichments that simulate natural structures increase range use and impact behavior of meat chickens. Slow-growing Delaware chickens were raised in floor pens (17 birds/pen) in a naturally ventilated house, with a pophole in each pen that allowed daily access to a vegetation-covered outdoor area. Feed and water were provided inside and outside. Birds were randomly assigned to one of 2 treatments: no range enrichment (control; NON) or range enrichment (ENR), which had roosts made of plastic pipe or screened shelters placed 7.6 m and 22.9 m from the house and overhead shade panels at 15.2 m. There were 4 replications. The numbers of birds inside and in the 4 quadrants of the range were counted in 7-min intervals 3 times daily (0900 h, 1300 h, and 1600 h) for 3 consecutive d when the birds were 7 and 10 wk of age; the numbers of birds performing various behaviors also were counted. On average, only 12.9% of birds used the range at any given time. The behavior of the birds was strongly affected by location (inside vs. outside), with birds mainly foraging and walking while outside and feeding, standing, and sitting while inside. Time of d impacted the number of birds that ranged (P ≤ 0.0001), with fewest birds outside during mid-day. Overall, birds using the range were most often (71%) observed in the quadrant nearest the house (zero to 7.6 m). However, in the ENR treatment, more birds (13%; P ≤ 0.0001) were observed in the farthest 2 quadrants (15.2 to 30.5 m from the house) than in the NON treatment (6%). This indicates that adding constructed enrichments to the range encouraged meat chickens to use it more fully.

Citing Articles

Outdoor access versus conventional broiler chicken production: Updated review of animal welfare, food safety, and meat quality.

Campbell Y, Walker L, Bartz B, Eckberg J, Pullin A Poult Sci. 2025; 104(4):104906.

PMID: 39985895 PMC: 11904540. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104906.


Performance, meat quality and blood parameters in four strains of organic broilers differ according to range use.

Bonnefous C, Collin A, Guilloteau L, Germain K, Ravon L, Bordeau T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30854.

PMID: 39730564 PMC: 11680767. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81672-9.


Impact of different range areas on behavior, welfare, and performance of Naked Neck chickens.

Zahid S, Usman M, Ishaq H, Haider M, Saleem M, Elahi U Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024; 56(7):227.

PMID: 39095552 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-024-04079-8.


Effect of different pasture species on welfare and behavior of slow-growing broiler chickens in free-range production system.

Bashir N, Sekeroglu A, Tainika B, Gur F, Duman M, Senturk Y Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023; 55(3):206.

PMID: 37198460 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-023-03616-1.


Effect of silvopasture system on fearfulness and leg health in fast-growing broiler chickens.

Paneru B, Pent G, Nastasi S, Downing A, Munsell J, Fike J PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0282923.

PMID: 36952445 PMC: 10035879. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282923.