» Articles » PMID: 37198460

Effect of Different Pasture Species on Welfare and Behavior of Slow-growing Broiler Chickens in Free-range Production System

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 May 17
PMID 37198460
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the effect of various pasture species on the welfare and behavior of slow-growing broiler chickens in the free-range production system. After 21 days completely indoors, the birds were permitted access to outdoor pens cultivated with one of the following pasture treatments: Medicago sativa (A), Trifolium repens (WC), Lolium perenne (PR), and a mixture (Mix, A + WC + PR). The range availability was restricted between 08:30 and 16:30 daily. It was found that pasture type had a significant effect on the fluctuating asymmetry of the face and radius length (P < 0.01). Duration of tonic immobility and blood parameters did not differ among the pasture species and between sexes at 11 weeks of broiler age (P > 0.05). Pasture treatment had no significant effect on broiler behaviors (P > 0.05). However, the age of broilers had a significant effect on pecking, dustbathing, and scratching (P < 0.01). Pecking behavior was affected by the time of the day; morning and afternoon (P < 0.01). Location had a significant effect on pecking and stretching behaviors (P < 0.01). In the study, dustbathing behavior was significantly affected by the interaction between location and age (P < 0.01), age and time of the day (P < 0.01), and location, age, and time of the day (P < 0.05). Scratching behavior was significantly affected by the interaction between location and time of the day (P < 0.05) and location, age and time of the day (P < 0.01). Stretching behavior was significantly affected by the interaction between location and age (P < 0.05) and location, age and time of the day (P < 0.05). It was concluded that access to the studied pasture species does not affect the evaluated welfare traits and observed behaviors. Therefore, it is suggested that other pasture species should be investigated to identify their effect on slow-growing strains in the free-range production system.

Citing Articles

Outdoor access versus conventional broiler chicken production: Updated review of animal welfare, food safety, and meat quality.

Campbell Y, Walker L, Bartz B, Eckberg J, Pullin A Poult Sci. 2025; 104(4):104906.

PMID: 39985895 PMC: 11904540. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104906.


The potential of pumice as a litter material and its influence on growth performance, carcass parameters, litter quality traits, behavior, and welfare in broiler chickens.

Duman M, Sekeroglu A, Tainika B Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024; 56(4):130.

PMID: 38635010 PMC: 11026241. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-024-03979-z.

References
1.
Buijs S, Van Poucke E, Van Dongen S, Lens L, Baert J, Tuyttens F . The influence of stocking density on broiler chicken bone quality and fluctuating asymmetry. Poult Sci. 2012; 91(8):1759-67. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01859. View

2.
Campbell D, Belson S, Dyall T, Lea J, Lee C . Impacts of Rearing Enrichments on Pullets' and Free-Range Hens' Positive Behaviors across the Flock Cycle. Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(3). PMC: 8833614. DOI: 10.3390/ani12030280. View

3.
Dawkins M . Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare. Zoology (Jena). 2005; 106(4):383-7. DOI: 10.1078/0944-2006-00122. View

4.
Dawkins M, Donnelly C, Jones T . Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature. 2004; 427(6972):342-4. DOI: 10.1038/nature02226. View

5.
Dawson L, Widowski T, Liu Z, Edwards A, Torrey S . In pursuit of a better broiler: a comparison of the inactivity, behavior, and enrichment use of fast- and slower growing broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2021; 100(12):101451. PMC: 8507195. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101451. View