» Articles » PMID: 27267409

Optimal Tracers for Parallel Labeling Experiments and C Metabolic Flux Analysis: A New Precision and Synergy Scoring System

Overview
Journal Metab Eng
Date 2016 Jun 9
PMID 27267409
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

C-Metabolic flux analysis (C-MFA) is a widely used approach in metabolic engineering for quantifying intracellular metabolic fluxes. The precision of fluxes determined by C-MFA depends largely on the choice of isotopic tracers and the specific set of labeling measurements. A recent advance in the field is the use of parallel labeling experiments for improved flux precision and accuracy. However, as of today, no systemic methods exist for identifying optimal tracers for parallel labeling experiments. In this contribution, we have addressed this problem by introducing a new scoring system and evaluating thousands of different isotopic tracer schemes. Based on this extensive analysis we have identified optimal tracers for C-MFA. The best single tracers were doubly C-labeled glucose tracers, including [1,6-C]glucose, [5,6-C]glucose and [1,2-C]glucose, which consistently produced the highest flux precision independent of the metabolic flux map (here, 100 random flux maps were evaluated). Moreover, we demonstrate that pure glucose tracers perform better overall than mixtures of glucose tracers. For parallel labeling experiments the optimal isotopic tracers were [1,6-C]glucose and [1,2-C]glucose. Combined analysis of [1,6-C]glucose and [1,2-C]glucose labeling data improved the flux precision score by nearly 20-fold compared to widely use tracer mixture 80% [1-C]glucose +20% [U-C]glucose.

Citing Articles

Thermodynamics shape the enzyme burden of glycolytic pathways.

Khana D, Jen A, Shishkova E, Thusoo E, Williams J, Henkel A bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39974948 PMC: 11838459. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.31.635972.


Mapping endocrine networks by stable isotope tracing.

Andrew R, Stimson R Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2024; 26:100381.

PMID: 39185272 PMC: 11344083. DOI: 10.1016/j.coemr.2022.100381.


Bayesian C-Metabolic Flux Analysis of Parallel Tracer Experiments in Granulocytes: A Directional Shift within the Non-Oxidative Pentose Phosphate Pathway Supports Phagocytosis.

Hogg M, Wolfschmitt E, Wachter U, Zink F, Radermacher P, Vogt J Metabolites. 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38248827 PMC: 10820746. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14010024.


Model validation and selection in metabolic flux analysis and flux balance analysis.

Kaste J, Shachar-Hill Y Biotechnol Prog. 2023; 40(1):e3413.

PMID: 37997613 PMC: 10922127. DOI: 10.1002/btpr.3413.


Determination of Metabolic Fluxes by Deep Learning of Isotope Labeling Patterns.

Law R, OKeeffe S, Nurwono G, Ki R, Lakhani A, Lai P bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37986781 PMC: 10659294. DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.06.565907.


References
1.
Antoniewicz M, Kelleher J, Stephanopoulos G . Elementary metabolite units (EMU): a novel framework for modeling isotopic distributions. Metab Eng. 2006; 9(1):68-86. PMC: 1994654. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2006.09.001. View

2.
Antoniewicz M, Kraynie D, Laffend L, Gonzalez-Lergier J, Kelleher J, Stephanopoulos G . Metabolic flux analysis in a nonstationary system: fed-batch fermentation of a high yielding strain of E. coli producing 1,3-propanediol. Metab Eng. 2007; 9(3):277-92. PMC: 2048574. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2007.01.003. View

3.
Hollinshead W, Henson W, Abernathy M, Moon T, Tang Y . Rapid metabolic analysis of Rhodococcus opacus PD630 via parallel 13C-metabolite fingerprinting. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015; 113(1):91-100. DOI: 10.1002/bit.25702. View

4.
Millard P, Massou S, Wittmann C, Portais J, Letisse F . Sampling of intracellular metabolites for stationary and non-stationary (13)C metabolic flux analysis in Escherichia coli. Anal Biochem. 2014; 465:38-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.07.026. View

5.
Sandberg T, Long C, Gonzalez J, Feist A, Antoniewicz M, Palsson B . Evolution of E. coli on [U-13C]Glucose Reveals a Negligible Isotopic Influence on Metabolism and Physiology. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0151130. PMC: 4786092. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151130. View