» Articles » PMID: 34239861

Robustifying Experimental Tracer Design ForC-Metabolic Flux Analysis

Overview
Date 2021 Jul 9
PMID 34239861
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

C metabolic flux analysis (MFA) has become an indispensable tool to measure metabolic reaction rates (fluxes) in living organisms, having an increasingly diverse range of applications. Here, the choice of theC labeled tracer composition makes the difference between an information-rich experiment and an experiment with only limited insights. To improve the chances for an informative labeling experiment, optimal experimental design approaches have been devised forC-MFA, all relying on some a priori knowledge about the actual fluxes. If such prior knowledge is unavailable, e.g., for research organisms and producer strains, existing methods are left with a chicken-and-egg problem. In this work, we present a general computational method, termed robustified experimental design (R-ED), to guide the decision making about suitable tracer choices when prior knowledge about the fluxes is lacking. Instead of focusing on one mixture, optimal for specific flux values, we pursue a sampling based approach and introduce a new design criterion, which characterizes the extent to which mixtures are informative in view of all possible flux values. The R-ED workflow enables the exploration of suitable tracer mixtures and provides full flexibility to trade off information and cost metrics. The potential of the R-ED workflow is showcased by applying the approach to the industrially relevant antibiotic producer , where we suggest informative, yet economic labeling strategies.

Citing Articles

Model validation and selection in metabolic flux analysis and flux balance analysis.

Kaste J, Shachar-Hill Y Biotechnol Prog. 2023; 40(1):e3413.

PMID: 37997613 PMC: 10922127. DOI: 10.1002/btpr.3413.


Practical sampling of constraint-based models: Optimized thinning boosts CHRR performance.

Jadebeck J, Wiechert W, Noh K PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(8):e1011378.

PMID: 37566638 PMC: 10446239. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011378.


Model Validation and Selection in Metabolic Flux Analysis and Flux Balance Analysis.

Kaste J, Shachar-Hill Y ArXiv. 2023; .

PMID: 36994165 PMC: 10055486.


TCA Cycle and Its Relationship with Clavulanic Acid Production: A Further Interpretation by Using a Reduced Genome-Scale Metabolic Model of .

Ramirez-Malule H, Lopez-Agudelo V, Gomez-Rios D, Ochoa S, Rios-Estepa R, Junne S Bioengineering (Basel). 2021; 8(8).

PMID: 34436106 PMC: 8389198. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering8080103.


Whither metabolic flux analysis in plants?.

Kruger N, Ratcliffe R J Exp Bot. 2021; 72(22):7653-7657.

PMID: 34431503 PMC: 8664579. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erab389.

References
1.
Borodina I, Krabben P, Nielsen J . Genome-scale analysis of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) metabolism. Genome Res. 2005; 15(6):820-9. PMC: 1142472. DOI: 10.1101/gr.3364705. View

2.
Antoniewicz M . 13C metabolic flux analysis: optimal design of isotopic labeling experiments. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013; 24(6):1116-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.02.003. View

3.
Gomez-Rios D, Junne S, Neubauer P, Ochoa S, Rios-Estepa R, Ramirez-Malule H . Characterization of the Metabolic Response of to Shear Stress in Stirred Tanks and Single-Use 2D Rocking Motion Bioreactors for Clavulanic Acid Production. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019; 8(4). PMC: 6963652. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics8040168. View

4.
Wiechert W, De Graaf A . Bidirectional reaction steps in metabolic networks: I. Modeling and simulation of carbon isotope labeling experiments. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997; 55(1):101-17. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970705)55:1<101::AID-BIT12>3.0.CO;2-P. View

5.
Crown S, Long C, Antoniewicz M . Optimal tracers for parallel labeling experiments and C metabolic flux analysis: A new precision and synergy scoring system. Metab Eng. 2016; 38:10-18. PMC: 5891732. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.06.001. View