» Articles » PMID: 31075299

PTEN and ERG Detection in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Compared to Systematic Biopsy

Overview
Journal Hum Pathol
Specialty Pathology
Date 2019 May 11
PMID 31075299
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy has been shown to outperform systematic biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Aside from tumor grade, tumor biomarkers such as phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and ETS-related gene (ERG) have prognostic significance in prostate cancer and may help direct management of patients with low-grade tumors. Our objective was to compare the detection of PTEN and ERG expression in MRI-targeted versus systematic prostate biopsies. We compared immunohistochemical expression for PTEN and ERG on prostate biopsy cores from patients with Grade Group (GG) 1 or GG2 prostate cancer who had undergone systematic biopsy with concurrent targeted biopsy. Fifty-three cases had both systematic and MRI-targeted prostate tissue available for staining for PTEN; and 52 cases, for ERG. ERG positivity was seen in 37/52 (71.2%) cases, and PTEN loss was seen in 15/53 (28.3%) cases. The detection of ERG expression was not significantly different between MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy (P = .4). Targeted biopsy was superior to systematic biopsy in the detection of PTEN loss (P = .02). MRI-targeted cores detected 14/15 (93.3%) cases of PTEN loss compared to 7/15 (46.7%) cases detected by systematic cores. Most cases with PTEN loss showed heterogeneous expression in both systematic and targeted cores. In 14/15 (93.3%) cases with PTEN loss, GG was the same between targeted and systematic biopsy. Targeted biopsy is superior to systematic biopsy in the detection of PTEN loss in GG1 and GG2 tumors. Inclusion of targeted cores may be helpful for evaluation of certain prognostic biomarkers.

Citing Articles

Combining tissue biomarkers with mpMRI to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. Analysis of 21 biomarkers in the PICTURE study.

Stopka-Farooqui U, Stavrinides V, Simpson B, Qureshi H, Carmona Echevierra L, Pye H Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024; .

PMID: 39578642 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00920-1.


Targeted Therapy for Cancers: From Ongoing Clinical Trials to FDA-Approved Drugs.

Choi H, Chang J Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(17).

PMID: 37686423 PMC: 10487969. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713618.


Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI predicts PTEN protein expression which can function as a prognostic measure of progression-free survival in NPC patients.

Wu G, Huang W, Xu J, Li W, Wu Y, Yang Q J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021; 148(7):1771-1780.

PMID: 34398299 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03764-7.


Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, and Preclinical and Clinical Data.

Sigorski D, Izycka-Swieszewska E, Bodnar L Target Oncol. 2020; 15(6):709-722.

PMID: 33044685 PMC: 7701127. DOI: 10.1007/s11523-020-00756-4.


Genetic Landscape of Prostate Cancer Conspicuity on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Bioinformatic Analysis.

Norris J, Simpson B, Parry M, Allen C, Ball R, Freeman A Eur Urol Open Sci. 2020; 20:37-47.

PMID: 33000006 PMC: 7497895. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.06.006.

References
1.
Gordetsky J, Schultz L, Porter K, Nix J, Thomas J, Pena M . Defining the optimal method for reporting prostate cancer grade and tumor extent on magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsies. Hum Pathol. 2018; 76:68-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.03.005. View

2.
Carver B, Tran J, Gopalan A, Chen Z, Shaikh S, Carracedo A . Aberrant ERG expression cooperates with loss of PTEN to promote cancer progression in the prostate. Nat Genet. 2009; 41(5):619-24. PMC: 2835150. DOI: 10.1038/ng.370. View

3.
Hansen N, Kesch C, Barrett T, Koo B, Radtke J, Bonekamp D . Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy. BJU Int. 2016; 120(5):631-638. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13711. View

4.
Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69(1):7-34. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21551. View

5.
Baumgartner E, Porter K, Nix J, Rais-Bahrami S, Gordetsky J . Detection of extraprostatic disease and seminal vesicle invasion in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsies. Transl Androl Urol. 2018; 7(Suppl 4):S392-S396. PMC: 6178323. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.03.15. View