PTEN and ERG Detection in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Compared to Systematic Biopsy
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy has been shown to outperform systematic biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Aside from tumor grade, tumor biomarkers such as phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and ETS-related gene (ERG) have prognostic significance in prostate cancer and may help direct management of patients with low-grade tumors. Our objective was to compare the detection of PTEN and ERG expression in MRI-targeted versus systematic prostate biopsies. We compared immunohistochemical expression for PTEN and ERG on prostate biopsy cores from patients with Grade Group (GG) 1 or GG2 prostate cancer who had undergone systematic biopsy with concurrent targeted biopsy. Fifty-three cases had both systematic and MRI-targeted prostate tissue available for staining for PTEN; and 52 cases, for ERG. ERG positivity was seen in 37/52 (71.2%) cases, and PTEN loss was seen in 15/53 (28.3%) cases. The detection of ERG expression was not significantly different between MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy (P = .4). Targeted biopsy was superior to systematic biopsy in the detection of PTEN loss (P = .02). MRI-targeted cores detected 14/15 (93.3%) cases of PTEN loss compared to 7/15 (46.7%) cases detected by systematic cores. Most cases with PTEN loss showed heterogeneous expression in both systematic and targeted cores. In 14/15 (93.3%) cases with PTEN loss, GG was the same between targeted and systematic biopsy. Targeted biopsy is superior to systematic biopsy in the detection of PTEN loss in GG1 and GG2 tumors. Inclusion of targeted cores may be helpful for evaluation of certain prognostic biomarkers.
Stopka-Farooqui U, Stavrinides V, Simpson B, Qureshi H, Carmona Echevierra L, Pye H Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024; .
PMID: 39578642 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00920-1.
Targeted Therapy for Cancers: From Ongoing Clinical Trials to FDA-Approved Drugs.
Choi H, Chang J Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(17).
PMID: 37686423 PMC: 10487969. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713618.
Wu G, Huang W, Xu J, Li W, Wu Y, Yang Q J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021; 148(7):1771-1780.
PMID: 34398299 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03764-7.
Sigorski D, Izycka-Swieszewska E, Bodnar L Target Oncol. 2020; 15(6):709-722.
PMID: 33044685 PMC: 7701127. DOI: 10.1007/s11523-020-00756-4.
Norris J, Simpson B, Parry M, Allen C, Ball R, Freeman A Eur Urol Open Sci. 2020; 20:37-47.
PMID: 33000006 PMC: 7497895. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.06.006.