Scientific Basis for Standardization of Fetal Head Measurements by Ultrasound: a Reproducibility Study

Overview

Journal Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2016 May 10

PMID 27158767

Citations 8

Authors

R Napolitano

V Donadono

E O Ohuma

C L Knight

S Z Wanyonyi

B Kemp

T Norris

A T Papageorghiou

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the standard methods for ultrasound measurement of fetal head circumference (HC) and biparietal diameter (BPD) (outer-to-outer (BPDoo) vs outer-to-inner (BPDoi) caliper placement), and compare acquisition of these measurements in transthalamic (TT) vs transventricular (TV) planes.

Methods: This study utilized ultrasound images acquired from women participating in the Oxford arm of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project. In the first phase of the study, BPDoo and BPDoi were measured on stored images. In the second phase, real-time measurements of BPD, occipitofrontal diameter (OFD) and HC in TT and TV planes were obtained by pairs of sonographers. Reproducibility of measurements made by the same (intraobserver) and by different (interobserver) sonographers, as well as the reproducibility of caliper placement and measurements obtained in different planes, was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.

Results: In Phase I, we analyzed ultrasound images of 108 singleton fetuses. The mean intraobserver and interobserver differences were < 2% (1.34 mm) and the 95% limits of agreement were < 5% (3 mm) for both BPDoo and BPDoi. Neither method for measuring BPD showed consistently better reproducibility. In Phase II, we analyzed ultrasound images of 100 different singleton fetuses. The mean intraobserver and interobserver differences were < 1% (2.26 mm) and the 95% limits of agreement were < 8% (14.45 mm) for all fetal head measurements obtained in TV and TT planes. Neither plane for measuring fetal head showed consistently better reproducibility. Measurement of HC using the ellipse facility was as reproducible as HC calculated from BPD and OFD. OFD by itself was the least reproducible of all fetal head measurements.

Conclusions: Measurements of BPDoi and BPDoo are equally reproducible; however, we believe BPDoo should be used in clinical practice as it allows fetal HC to be measured and compared with neonatal HC. For all head measurements, TV and TT planes provide equally reproducible values at any gestational age, and HC values are similar in both planes. Fetal head measurement in the TT plane is preferable as international standards in this plane are available; however, measurements in the TV plane can be plotted on the same standards. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Citing Articles

Transvaginal cervical cerclage: double monofilament modified Wurm vs single braided McDonald technique.

Donadono V, Koutikwar P, Banerjee A, Ivan M, Colley C, Sciacca M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025; 65(3):344-352.

PMID: 39998160 PMC: 11872348. DOI: 10.1002/uog.29184.

Modality-level obstacles and initiatives to improve representation in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research samples.

Margolis E, Nelson P, Fiske A, Champaud J, Olson H, Gomez M Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025; 72:101505.

PMID: 39954600 PMC: 11875194. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101505.

Reproducibility of fetal ultrasound doppler parameters used for growth assessment.

Zidan Sweid R, Donadono V, Casagrandi D, Sarno L, Attilakos G, Pandya P Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025; .

PMID: 39821448 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07883-7.

Three-Dimensional Volume Ultrasound Assessment of Cesarean Scar Niche and Cervix in Pregnant Women: A Reproducibility Study.

Ivan M, Mahdy H, Banerjee A, Tetteh A, Greenwold N, Casagrandi D J Ultrasound Med. 2024; 44(3):509-519.

PMID: 39508476 PMC: 11796327. DOI: 10.1002/jum.16613.

Etiologically Based Functional Taxonomy of the Preterm Birth Syndrome.

Villar J, Cavoretto P, Barros F, Romero R, Papageorghiou A, Kennedy S Clin Perinatol. 2024; 51(2):475-495.

PMID: 38705653 PMC: 11632914. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2024.02.014.

References

Gull I, Fait G, Har-Toov J, Kupferminc M, Lessing J, Jaffa A . Prediction of fetal weight by ultrasound: the contribution of additional examiners. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 20(1):57-60. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00742.x. View

Chan L, Fung T, Leung T, Sahota D, Lau T . Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 33(4):447-52. DOI: 10.1002/uog.6321. View

Hadlock F, Deter R, Harrist R, Park S . Fetal head circumference: relation to menstrual age. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982; 138(4):649-53. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.138.4.649. View

Sarris I, Ioannou C, Chamberlain P, Ohuma E, Roseman F, Hoch L . Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 39(3):266-73. DOI: 10.1002/uog.10082. View

Ioannou C, Javaid M, Mahon P, Yaqub M, Harvey N, Godfrey K . The effect of maternal vitamin D concentration on fetal bone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 97(11):E2070-7. PMC: 3485609. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2012-2538. View

Salomon L, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, Bilardo C, Hernandez-Andrade E, Johnsen S . Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 37(1):116-26. DOI: 10.1002/uog.8831. View

Yang F, Leung K, Lee Y, Chan H, Tang M . Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 35(5):566-71. DOI: 10.1002/uog.7600. View

Wanyonyi S, Napolitano R, Ohuma E, Salomon L, Papageorghiou A . Image-scoring system for crown-rump length measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44(6):649-54. DOI: 10.1002/uog.13376. View

Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

10.

Krampl E, Lees C, Bland J, Espinoza Dorado J, Moscoso G, Campbell S . Fetal biometry at 4300 m compared to sea level in Peru. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 16(1):9-18. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00156.x. View

11.

Larsen T, Petersen S, Greisen G, LARSEN J . Normal fetal growth evaluated by longitudinal ultrasound examinations. Early Hum Dev. 1990; 24(1):37-45. DOI: 10.1016/0378-3782(90)90004-3. View

12.

Shepard M, Filly R . A standardized plane for biparietal diameter measurement. J Ultrasound Med. 1982; 1(4):145-50. DOI: 10.7863/jum.1982.1.4.145. View

13.

Perni S, Chervenak F, Kalish R, Magherini-Rothe S, Predanic M, Streltzoff J . Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 24(6):654-8. DOI: 10.1002/uog.1717. View

14.

Cheikh Ismail L, Knight H, Ohuma E, Hoch L, Chumlea W . Anthropometric standardisation and quality control protocols for the construction of new, international, fetal and newborn growth standards: the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. BJOG. 2013; 120 Suppl 2:48-55, v. PMC: 4019016. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12127. View

15.

Villar J, Papageorghiou A, Pang R, Ohuma E, Ismail L, Barros F . The likeness of fetal growth and newborn size across non-isolated populations in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study and Newborn Cross-Sectional Study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014; 2(10):781-92. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70121-4. View

16.

Ioannou C, Sarris I, Hoch L, Salomon L, Papageorghiou A . Standardisation of crown-rump length measurement. BJOG. 2013; 120 Suppl 2:38-41, v. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12056. View

17.

Leung T, Pang M, Daljit S, Leung T, Poon C, Wong S . Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31(3):321-7. DOI: 10.1002/uog.5192. View

18.

Papageorghiou A, Sarris I, Ioannou C, Todros T, Carvalho M, Pilu G . Ultrasound methodology used to construct the fetal growth standards in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. BJOG. 2013; 120 Suppl 2:27-32, v. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12313. View

19.

Di Battista E, Bertino E, Benso L, Fabris C, Aicardi G, Pagliano M . Longitudinal distance standards of fetal growth. Intrauterine and Infant Longitudinal Growth Study: IILGS. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79(3):165-73. View

20.

Merialdi M, Caulfield L, Zavaleta N, Figueroa A, Costigan K, Dominici F . Fetal growth in Peru: comparisons with international fetal size charts and implications for fetal growth assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 26(2):123-8. DOI: 10.1002/uog.1954. View