Reproducibility of Fetal Ultrasound Doppler Parameters Used for Growth Assessment

Overview

Journal Arch Gynecol Obstet

Date 2025 Jan 17

PMID 39821448

Authors

Raghda Zidan Sweid

Vera Donadono

Davide Casagrandi

Laura Sarno

George Attilakos

Pran Pandya

Raffaele Napolitano

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To produce standards of references for quality control and assess the reproducibility of fetal ultrasound Doppler measurements commonly used for blood flow assessment in fetal growth.

Methods: Women with singleton normal pregnancies were prospectively recruited at University College London Hospital, UK, between 24 and 41 weeks. Umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), and their pulsatility indices (PI), resistance indices (RI) and ratios such as cerebro-placental (CPR) and umbilical cerebral ratio (UCR) were obtained twice by two sonographers in training or after completion of training, blind to each other's measurements. Bland-Altman plots were generated, the mean differences and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated to assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility. Values were expressed as absolute values or as z-score.

Results: One hundred ten women were recruited. Overall reproducibility was variable for absolute values and highly variable for z-scores, independently from vessel sampled, index or ratio used, intra- or interobserver reproducibility. The widest absolute values of 95% LOA were 0.3 for UA PI, 0.7 for MCA PI, 0.9 for CPR and 0.3 for UCR, respectively. Regarding z-score, the widest 95% LOA were 1.9 for UA PI, 2.1 for CPR and 1 for UCR. Reproducibility was slightly better for intra- compared with interobserver variability. There was significant difference in z-score reproducibility between MCA peak systolic velocity and CPR vs UCR.

Conclusions: Reference standards of reproducibility of fetal Doppler parameters are produced for standardization and quality-control purposes. Overall, the reproducibility for fetal Doppler parameters was variable independently from vessel sampled, Doppler index (PI or RI) or ratio used, intra- and interobserver comparison. UCR was the most reproducible parameter which should be recommended, together with UA PI, for clinical use and in research studies on fetal growth.

References

Stampalija T, Thornton J, Marlow N, Napolitano R, Bhide A, Pickles T . Fetal cerebral Doppler changes and outcome in late preterm fetal growth restriction: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56(2):173-181. DOI: 10.1002/uog.22125. View

Kagan K, Hoopmann M, Geipel A, Sonek J, Enders M . Prenatal parvovirus B19 infection. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(5):2363-2371. PMC: 11485125. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07644-6. View

Scholz A, Ronay V, Wallwiener M, Fluhr H, von Au A, Spratte J . Association between Doppler assessment and secondary cesarean delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(2):719-728. PMC: 11258169. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07559-2. View

Ashkar Majadla N, Abu Shqara R, Frank Wolf M, Tuma R, Lowenstein L, Odeh M . The role of the cerebroplacental ratio in predicting pregnancy outcomes at 40-42 gestational weeks: a prospective observational trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(1):113-119. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07372-x. View

Wolf H, Stampalija T, Lees C . Fetal cerebral blood-flow redistribution: analysis of Doppler reference charts and association of different thresholds with adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 58(5):705-715. PMC: 8597586. DOI: 10.1002/uog.23615. View

Wolf H, Stampalija T, Monasta L, Lees C . Ratio of umbilical and cerebral artery pulsatility indices in assessment of fetal risk: numerator and denominator matter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56(2):163-165. DOI: 10.1002/uog.22004. View

Lees C, Stampalija T, Baschat A, da Silva Costa F, Ferrazzi E, Figueras F . ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56(2):298-312. DOI: 10.1002/uog.22134. View

Salomon L, Alfirevic Z, da Silva Costa F, Deter R, Figueras F, Ghi T . ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53(6):715-723. DOI: 10.1002/uog.20272. View

Donadono V, Cavallaro A, Roberts N, Ioannou C, Papageorghiou A, Napolitano R . A Systematic Review of Methodology Used in Studies Aimed at Creating Charts of Fetal Brain Structures. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(6). PMC: 8223776. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11060916. View

10.

Granozio G, Napolitano R . Quality control of fetal biometric evaluation and Doppler ultrasound. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 73(4):415-422. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.21.04795-X. View

11.

Oros D, Ruiz-Martinez S, Staines-Urias E, Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Fabre E . Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 53(4):454-464. DOI: 10.1002/uog.20102. View

12.

Donadono V, Ambroise Grandjean G, Stegen M, Collin A, Bertholdt C, Casagrandi D . Training in Obstetric Ultrasound Biometry: Results from a Multicenter Reproducibility Study. J Ultrasound Med. 2022; 41(11):2819-2825. DOI: 10.1002/jum.15969. View

13.

Molloholli M, Napolitano R, Ohuma E, Ash S, Wanyonyi S, Cavallaro A . Image-scoring system for umbilical and uterine artery pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 53(2):251-255. DOI: 10.1002/uog.19101. View

14.

Bhide A, Acharya G, Baschat A, Bilardo C, Brezinka C, Cafici D . ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): use of Doppler velocimetry in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 58(2):331-339. DOI: 10.1002/uog.23698. View

15.

Ruiz-Martinez S, Volpe G, Vannuccini S, Cavallaro A, Impey L, Ioannou C . An objective scoring method to evaluate image quality of middle cerebral artery Doppler. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 33(3):421-426. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1494711. View

16.

Drukker L, Staines-Urias E, Villar J, Barros F, Carvalho M, Munim S . International gestational age-specific centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices: a longitudinal prospective cohort study of the INTERGROWTH-21 Project. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222(6):602.e1-602.e15. PMC: 7287403. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.012. View

17.

Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T . Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 30(3):287-96. DOI: 10.1002/uog.4088. View

18.

Baschat A, Gembruch U . The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 21(2):124-7. DOI: 10.1002/uog.20. View

19.

Arduini D, Rizzo G . Normal values of Pulsatility Index from fetal vessels: a cross-sectional study on 1556 healthy fetuses. J Perinat Med. 1990; 18(3):165-72. DOI: 10.1515/jpme.1990.18.3.165. View

20.

Napolitano R, Donadono V, Ohuma E, Knight C, Wanyonyi S, Kemp B . Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48(1):80-5. PMC: 5113683. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15956. View