» Articles » PMID: 27141461

Models Predicting Success of Infertility Treatment: A Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2016 May 4
PMID 27141461
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Infertile couples are faced with problems that affect their marital life. Infertility treatment is expensive and time consuming and occasionally isn't simply possible. Prediction models for infertility treatment have been proposed and prediction of treatment success is a new field in infertility treatment. Because prediction of treatment success is a new need for infertile couples, this paper reviewed previous studies for catching a general concept in applicability of the models.

Methods: This study was conducted as a systematic review at Avicenna Research Institute in 2015. Six data bases were searched based on WHO definitions and MESH key words. Papers about prediction models in infertility were evaluated.

Results: Eighty one papers were eligible for the study. Papers covered years after 1986 and studies were designed retrospectively and prospectively. IVF prediction models have more shares in papers. Most common predictors were age, duration of infertility, ovarian and tubal problems.

Conclusion: Prediction model can be clinically applied if the model can be statistically evaluated and has a good validation for treatment success. To achieve better results, the physician and the couples' needs estimation for treatment success rate were based on history, the examination and clinical tests. Models must be checked for theoretical approach and appropriate validation. The privileges for applying the prediction models are the decrease in the cost and time, avoiding painful treatment of patients, assessment of treatment approach for physicians and decision making for health managers. The selection of the approach for designing and using these models is inevitable.

Citing Articles

The impact of low oocyte maturity ratio on blastocyst euploidy rate: a matched retrospective cohort study.

Ou Z, Du J, Liu N, Fang X, Wen X, Li J Contracept Reprod Med. 2024; 9(1):41.

PMID: 39187878 PMC: 11346022. DOI: 10.1186/s40834-024-00303-w.


Modelling and comparing the use of IVF and ICSI in Australia.

Mazi M, James G, Temple-Smith P, Mol B J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(7):1783-1791.

PMID: 38913108 PMC: 11263460. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03163-0.


Development of a machine learning-based prediction model for clinical pregnancy of intrauterine insemination in a large Chinese population.

Wu J, Li T, Xu L, Chen L, Liang X, Lin A J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(8):2173-2183.

PMID: 38819714 PMC: 11339014. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03153-2.


Prediction of Reproductive Outcomes of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles Using a Multivariate Scoring System.

Abden A, Kamel M, Fetih A, Yousef A J Hum Reprod Sci. 2024; 17(1):33-41.

PMID: 38665614 PMC: 11041322. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_4_24.


A hybrid feature selection algorithm to determine effective factors in predictive model of success rate for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment: A cross-sectional study.

Mehrjerd A, Rezaei H, Eslami S, Khadem Ghaebi N Int J Reprod Biomed. 2024; 21(12):995-1012.

PMID: 38370489 PMC: 10869959. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i12.15038.


References
1.
Mol B, Collins J, Burrows E, van der Veen F, Bossuyt P . Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(5):1237-42. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1237. View

2.
Syrop C, Dawson J, Husman K, Sparks A, Van Voorhis B . Ovarian volume may predict assisted reproductive outcomes better than follicle stimulating hormone concentration on day 3. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(7):1752-6. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.7.1752. View

3.
Stolwijk A, Wetzels A, Braat D . Cumulative probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to a woman's age, subfertility diagnosis and primary or secondary subfertility. Hum Reprod. 1999; 15(1):203-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.1.203. View

4.
Bancsi L, Huijs A, den Ouden C, Broekmans F, Looman C, Blankenstein M . Basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels are of limited value in predicting ongoing pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2000; 73(3):552-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00552-x. View

5.
Smeenk J, Stolwijk A, Kremer J, Braat D . External validation of the templeton model for predicting success after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(5):1065-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.5.1065. View