» Articles » PMID: 10872017

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXII: How to Use Articles About Clinical Decision Rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2000 Jun 29
PMID 10872017
Citations 275
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clinical experience provides clinicians with an intuitive sense of which findings on history, physical examination, and investigation are critical in making an accurate diagnosis, or an accurate assessment of a patient's fate. A clinical decision rule (CDR) is a clinical tool that quantifies the individual contributions that various components of the history, physical examination, and basic laboratory results make toward the diagnosis, prognosis, or likely response to treatment in a patient. Clinical decision rules attempt to formally test, simplify, and increase the accuracy of clinicians' diagnostic and prognostic assessments. Existing CDRs guide clinicians, establish pretest probability, provide screening tests for common problems, and estimate risk. Three steps are involved in the development and testing of a CDR: creation of the rule, testing or validating the rule, and assessing the impact of the rule on clinical behavior. Clinicians evaluating CDRs for possible clinical use should assess the following components: the method of derivation; the validation of the CDR to ensure that its repeated use leads to the same results; and its predictive power. We consider CDRs that have been validated in a new clinical setting to be level 1 CDRs and most appropriate for implementation. Level 1 CDRs have the potential to inform clinical judgment, to change clinical behavior, and to reduce unnecessary costs, while maintaining quality of care and patient satisfaction. JAMA. 2000;284:79-84

Citing Articles

Thromboembolism Risk Profiles in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: How Can Machine Learning-Based Analysis Add to Our Understanding?.

Goldin M, Spyropoulos A J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39804555 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09372-2.


No prediction without prevention: A global qualitative study of attitudes toward using a prediction tool for risk of developing depression during adolescence.

Kohrt B, Wahid S, Ottman K, Burgess A, Viduani A, Martini T Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025; 11():e129.

PMID: 39777002 PMC: 11704374. DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2024.136.


Risk-stratification tools for emergency department patients with syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct evidence for SAEM GRACE.

Wakai A, Sinert R, Zehtabchi S, Souza I, Benabbas R, Allen R Acad Emerg Med. 2024; 32(1):72-86.

PMID: 39496561 PMC: 11726151. DOI: 10.1111/acem.15041.


Clinical Decision Rules: A Starting Place in Medical Education, Not a Destination.

Woods W, Barnes B, Waggoner-Fountain L J Grad Med Educ. 2024; 16(5):513-516.

PMID: 39416409 PMC: 11475424. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00144.1.


Methods of a cluster-randomized, type II hybrid implementation effectiveness trial to prospectively assess extended-duration thromboprophylaxis for at-risk medical patients being discharged to prevent hospital-associated venous thromboembolism.

Woller S, Stevens S, Bledsoe J, Hellewell J, Kraft A, Butler A Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024; 8(6):102549.

PMID: 39403187 PMC: 11472710. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102549.