» Articles » PMID: 36050710

Developing Machine Learning-based Models to Predict Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) Success by Address Modeling Challenges in Imbalanced Data and Providing Modification Solutions for Them

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Sep 1
PMID 36050710
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study sought to provide machine learning-based classification models to predict the success of intrauterine insemination (IUI) therapy. Additionally, we sought to illustrate the effect of models fitting with balanced data vs original data with imbalanced data labels using two different types of resampling methods. Finally, we fit models with all features against optimized feature sets using various feature selection techniques.

Methods: The data for the cross-sectional study were collected from 546 infertile couples with IUI at the Fatemehzahra Infertility Research Center, Babol, North of Iran. Logistic regression (LR), support vector classification, random forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and, Stacking generalization (Stack) as the machine learning classifiers were used to predict IUI success by Python v3.7. We employed the Smote-Tomek (Stomek) and Smote-ENN (SENN) resampling methods to address the imbalance problem in the original dataset. Furthermore, to increase the performance of the models, mutual information classification (MIC-FS), genetic algorithm (GA-FS), and random forest (RF-FS) were used to select the ideal feature sets for model development.

Results: In this study, 28% of patients undergoing IUI treatment obtained a successful pregnancy. Also, the average age of women and men was 24.98 and 29.85 years, respectively. The calibration plot in this study for IUI success prediction by machine learning models showed that between feature selection methods, the RF-FS, and among the datasets used to fit the models, the balanced dataset with the Stomek method had well-calibrating predictions than other methods. Finally, the brier scores for the LR, SVC, RF, XGBoost, and Stack models that were fitted utilizing the Stomek dataset and the chosen feature set using the Random Forest technique obtained equal to 0.202, 0.183, 0.158, 0.129, and 0.134, respectively. It showed duration of infertility, male and female age, sperm concentration, and sperm motility grading score as the most predictable factors in IUI success.

Conclusion: The results of this study with the XGBoost prediction model can be used to foretell the individual success of IUI for each couple before initiating therapy.

Citing Articles

Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Management of Male Infertility, a Scoping Review.

Naik N, Roth B, Lundy S Curr Urol Rep. 2024; 26(1):17.

PMID: 39520645 PMC: 11550229. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01239-z.


Diagnostic value of oxidation-reduction potential for male infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tan Y, Yuan Y, Yang X, Wang Y, Liu L Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(7):1228-1238.

PMID: 39100838 PMC: 11291403. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-32.


Development of a machine learning-based prediction model for clinical pregnancy of intrauterine insemination in a large Chinese population.

Wu J, Li T, Xu L, Chen L, Liang X, Lin A J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(8):2173-2183.

PMID: 38819714 PMC: 11339014. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03153-2.


Criteria for implementing artificial intelligence systems in reproductive medicine.

Guell E Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2023; 51(1):1-12.

PMID: 38035589 PMC: 10914497. DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2023.06009.


An Algorithm to Predict the Lack of Pregnancy after Intrauterine Insemination in Infertile Patients.

Garcia-Grau E, Oliveira M, Amengual M, Rodriguez-Sanchez E, Veraguas-Imbernon A, Costa L J Clin Med. 2023; 12(9).

PMID: 37176664 PMC: 10179676. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093225.

References
1.
Blank C, Wildeboer R, DeCroo I, Tilleman K, Weyers B, De Sutter P . Prediction of implantation after blastocyst transfer in in vitro fertilization: a machine-learning perspective. Fertil Steril. 2019; 111(2):318-326. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.030. View

2.
Madhuri M, Thyagaraju C, Naidu A, Dasari P . The effect of endometrial scratching on pregnancy rate after failed intrauterine insemination: A Randomised Controlled Trail. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 268:37-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.028. View

3.
Guzick D, Carson S, Coutifaris C, Overstreet J, Factor-Litvak P, Steinkampf M . Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340(3):177-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199901213400302. View

4.
Leushuis E, van der Steeg J, Steures P, Bossuyt P, Eijkemans M, van der Veen F . Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2009; 15(5):537-52. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmp013. View

5.
Pan M, Hockenberry M, Kirby E, Lipshultz L . Male Infertility Diagnosis and Treatment in the Era of In Vitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Med Clin North Am. 2018; 102(2):337-347. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.10.008. View