» Articles » PMID: 27141257

Effects of Crown Retrieval on Implants and the Surrounding Bone: a Finite Element Analysis

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2016 May 4
PMID 27141257
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to observe stress concentration in the implant, the surrounding bone, and other components under the pull-out force during the crown removal.

Materials And Methods: Two 3-dimensional models of implant-supported conventional metal ceramic crowns were digitally constructed. One model was designed as a vertically placed implant (3.7 mm × 10 mm) with a straight abutment, and the other model was designed as a 30-degree inclined implant (3.7 mm × 10 mm) with an angled abutment. A pull-out force of 40 N was applied to the crown. The stress values were calculated within the dental implant, the abutment, the abutment screw, and the surrounding bone.

Results: The highest stress concentration was observed at the coronal portion of the straight implant (9.29 MPa). The stress concentrations at the cortical bone were lower than at the implants, and maximum stress concentration in bone structure was 1.73 MPa. At the abutment screws, the stress concentration levels were similiar (3.09 MPa and 3.44 MPa), but the localizations were different. The stress at the angled abutment was higher than the stress at the straight abutment.

Conclusion: The pull-out force, applied during a crown removal, did not show an evident effect in bone structure. The higher stress concentrations were mostly observed at the implant and the abutment collar. In addition, the abutment screw, which is the weakest part of an implant system, also showed stress concentrations. Implant angulation affected the stress concentration levels and localizations.

Clinical Implications: These results will help clinicians understand the mechanical behavior of cement-retained implant-supported crowns during crown retrieval.

Citing Articles

Pull-Off Forces on Implant-Supported Single Restorations by Sticky Food: An In Vitro Study.

Bishti S, Homa M, Wolfart S, Tuna T Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024; 36(1):40-50.

PMID: 39206743 PMC: 11701967. DOI: 10.1111/clr.14355.


Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.

Deste Gokay G, Oyar P, Gokcimen G, Durkan R BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):545.

PMID: 38730391 PMC: 11088090. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04328-0.


Application of Semipermanent Cements and Conventional Cement with Modified Cementing Technique in Dental Implantology.

Veselinovic V, Marin S, Tatic Z, Trtic N, Dolic O, Adamovic T Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022; 55(4):367-379.

PMID: 35001932 PMC: 8734451. DOI: 10.15644/asc55/4/4.


Impact of cement type and abutment height on pull-off force of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns on titanium implant stock abutments: an in vitro study.

Muller L, Rauch A, Reissmann D, Schierz O BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):592.

PMID: 34798850 PMC: 8603517. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01958-6.


Effects of Different Positions and Angles of Implants in Maxillary Edentulous Jaw on Surrounding Bone Stress under Dynamic Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Liu X, Pang F, Li Y, Jia H, Cui X, Yue Y Comput Math Methods Med. 2020; 2019:8074096.

PMID: 31933678 PMC: 6942770. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8074096.

References
1.
Frost H . A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74(1):3-15. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0003:AUOBPA>2.0.CO;2. View

2.
Paula Martini A, Barros R, Junior A, Rocha E, de Almeida E, Ferraz C . Influence of platform and abutment angulation on peri-implant bone. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2012; 39(6):663-9. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00029. View

3.
Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M . Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13(4):343-8. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130401.x. View

4.
Akca K, Iplikcioglu H . Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prosthesis in mandibular posterior edentulism. Part II: 3-D finite element stress analysis. Implant Dent. 2002; 10(4):238-45. DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200110000-00006. View

5.
Vohra F, Habib R . Knowledge and attitude of dentists toward implant retained restorations in Saudi Arabia. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015; 18(3):312-7. DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.151788. View