» Articles » PMID: 27131909

Attentional Mechanisms of Social Perception Are Biased in Social Phobia

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2016 May 2
PMID 27131909
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies of social phobia have reported an increased vigilance to social threat cues but also an avoidance of socially relevant stimuli such as eye gaze. The primary aim of this study was to examine attentional mechanisms relevant for perceiving social cues by means of abnormalities in scanning of facial features in patients with social phobia. In two novel experimental paradigms, patients with social phobia and healthy controls matched on age, gender and education were compared regarding their gazing behavior towards facial cues. The first experiment was an emotion classification paradigm which allowed for differentiating reflexive attentional shifts from sustained attention towards diagnostically relevant facial features. In the second experiment, attentional orienting by gaze direction was assessed in a gaze-cueing paradigm in which non-predictive gaze cues shifted attention towards or away from subsequently presented targets. We found that patients as compared to controls reflexively oriented their attention more frequently towards the eyes of emotional faces in the emotion classification paradigm. This initial hypervigilance for the eye region was observed at very early attentional stages when faces were presented for 150ms, and persisted when facial stimuli were shown for 3s. Moreover, a delayed attentional orienting into the direction of eye gaze was observed in individuals with social phobia suggesting a differential time course of eye gaze processing in patients and controls. Our findings suggest that basic mechanisms of early attentional exploration of social cues are biased in social phobia and might contribute to the development and maintenance of the disorder.

Citing Articles

Expectations guide predictive eye movements and information sampling during face recognition.

Garlichs A, Lustig M, Gamer M, Blank H iScience. 2024; 27(10):110920.

PMID: 39351204 PMC: 11439840. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110920.


Vigilance or avoidance: How do autistic traits and social anxiety modulate attention to the eyes?.

Ni W, Lu H, Wang Q, Song C, Yi L Front Neurosci. 2023; 16:1081769.

PMID: 36711128 PMC: 9876610. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1081769.


Threat induction biases processing of emotional expressions.

Flechsenhar A, Levine S, Bertsch K Front Psychol. 2022; 13:967800.

PMID: 36507050 PMC: 9730731. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967800.


No evidence that gaze anxiety predicts gaze avoidance behavior during face-to-face social interaction.

Tonsing D, Schiller B, Vehlen A, Spenthof I, Domes G, Heinrichs M Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):21332.

PMID: 36494411 PMC: 9734162. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25189-z.


Contribution of Eye-Tracking to Study Cognitive Impairments Among Clinical Populations.

Wolf A, Ueda K Front Psychol. 2021; 12:590986.

PMID: 34163391 PMC: 8215550. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590986.


References
1.
Veit R, Flor H, Erb M, Hermann C, Lotze M, Grodd W . Brain circuits involved in emotional learning in antisocial behavior and social phobia in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2002; 328(3):233-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00519-0. View

2.
Wieser M, Pauli P, Alpers G, Muhlberger A . Is eye to eye contact really threatening and avoided in social anxiety?--An eye-tracking and psychophysiology study. J Anxiety Disord. 2008; 23(1):93-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.04.004. View

3.
Heuer K, Lange W, Isaac L, Rinck M, Becker E . Morphed emotional faces: emotion detection and misinterpretation in social anxiety. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2010; 41(4):418-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.04.005. View

4.
Smith M, Cottrell G, Gosselin F, Schyns P . Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychol Sci. 2005; 16(3):184-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00801.x. View

5.
Mogg K, Philippot P, Bradley B . Selective attention to angry faces in clinical social phobia. J Abnorm Psychol. 2004; 113(1):160-5. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.113.1.160. View