» Articles » PMID: 28424635

Preferential Processing of Social Features and Their Interplay with Physical Saliency in Complex Naturalistic Scenes

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Apr 21
PMID 28424635
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

According to so-called saliency-based attention models, attention during free viewing of visual scenes is particularly allocated to physically salient image regions. In the present study, we assumed that social features in complex naturalistic scenes would be processed preferentially irrespective of their physical saliency. Therefore, we expected worse prediction of gazing behavior by saliency-based attention models when social information is present in the visual field. To test this hypothesis, participants freely viewed color photographs of complex naturalistic social (e.g., including heads, bodies) and non-social (e.g., including landscapes, objects) scenes while their eye movements were recorded. In agreement with our hypothesis, we found that social features (especially heads) were heavily prioritized during visual exploration. Correspondingly, the presence of social information weakened the influence of low-level saliency on gazing behavior. Importantly, this pattern was most pronounced for the earliest fixations indicating automatic attentional processes. These findings were further corroborated by a linear mixed model approach showing that social features (especially heads) add substantially to the prediction of fixations beyond physical saliency. Taken together, the current study indicates gazing behavior for naturalistic scenes to be better predicted by the interplay of social and physically salient features than by low-level saliency alone. These findings strongly challenge the generalizability of saliency-based attention models and demonstrate the importance of considering social influences when investigating the driving factors of human visual attention.

Citing Articles

A gaze into the void: Anticipatory saccades toward prevented events.

Tonn S, Teigeler J, Pfister R, Gamer M Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; .

PMID: 40011338 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-025-03019-4.


Influence of prior knowledge on eye movements to scenes as revealed by hidden Markov models.

Pedziwiatr M, Heer S, Coutrot A, Bex P, Mareschal I J Vis. 2023; 23(10):10.

PMID: 37721772 PMC: 10511023. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.10.10.


Bilingual toddlers show increased attention capture by static faces compared to monolinguals.

Mousley V, MacSweeney M, Mercure E Biling (Camb Engl). 2023; 26(4):835-844.

PMID: 37636491 PMC: 7614981. DOI: 10.1017/S136672892200092X.


Social prioritisation in scene viewing and the effects of a spatial memory load.

Martinez-Cedillo A, Dent K, Foulsham T Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 86(4):1237-1247.

PMID: 37563513 PMC: 11093800. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02769-3.


Enhancing precision in human neuroscience.

Nebe S, Reutter M, Baker D, Bolte J, Domes G, Gamer M Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37555830 PMC: 10411974. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.85980.


References
1.
Einhauser W, Rutishauser U, Koch C . Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. J Vis. 2008; 8(2):2.1-19. DOI: 10.1167/8.2.2. View

2.
Marchewka A, Zurawski L, Jednorog K, Grabowska A . The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database. Behav Res Methods. 2013; 46(2):596-610. PMC: 4030128. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0379-1. View

3.
Gregory N, Lopez B, Graham G, Marshman P, Bate S, Kargas N . Reduced gaze following and attention to heads when viewing a "live" social scene. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0121792. PMC: 4390321. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121792. View

4.
Santangelo V, Di Francesco S, Mastroberardino S, Macaluso E . Parietal cortex integrates contextual and saliency signals during the encoding of natural scenes in working memory. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015; 36(12):5003-17. PMC: 6869543. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22984. View

5.
Kano F, Tomonaga M . Perceptual mechanism underlying gaze guidance in chimpanzees and humans. Anim Cogn. 2011; 14(3):377-86. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-010-0372-3. View