» Articles » PMID: 27096118

Microarray Scanner Performance Over a Five-Week Period As Measured With Cy5 and Cy3 Serial Dilution Slides

Overview
Date 2016 Apr 21
PMID 27096118
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To investigate scanner performance and guide development of an instrument qualification method, slides with replicates of successive dilutions of cyanine 5 (Cy5) and cyanine 3 (Cy3) dyes (referred to as dye slides) were scanned. The successive dilutions form a dose-response curve from which performance can be assessed. The effects of a variety of factors, including the number of scans and slide storage conditions, on scanner performance over a five-week period were investigated and tracked with time series charts of dye signal intensity, signal-to-noise (S/N), signal background, slope, and limit of detection (LOD). Scanner drift was tracked with a known stable reference material, Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2242. The greatest effect on the figures of merit was the dye, with the Cy5 dye showing signs of degradation after one week of scanning independent of all other factors while the Cy3 dye remained relatively stable. Use of the charts to track scanner performance over time holds promise for development of a method for microarray scanner performance qualification. Although not a prescription for performance qualification, this introductory study provides sufficient information regarding the use of dye slides to enable the user to institute a preliminary test method.

Citing Articles

Array Analysis Manager-An automated DNA microarray analysis tool simplifying microarray data filtering, bias recognition, normalization, and expression analysis.

von der Haar M, Lindner P, Scheper T, Stahl F Eng Life Sci. 2020; 17(8):841-846.

PMID: 32624831 PMC: 6999572. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201700046.


Optimization of Cyanine Dye Stability and Analysis of FRET Interaction on DNA Microarrays.

von der Haar M, Heuer C, Pahler M, von der Haar K, Lindner P, Scheper T Biology (Basel). 2016; 5(4).

PMID: 27916881 PMC: 5192427. DOI: 10.3390/biology5040047.


The Impact of Photobleaching on Microarray Analysis.

von der Haar M, Preuss J, von der Haar K, Lindner P, Scheper T, Stahl F Biology (Basel). 2015; 4(3):556-72.

PMID: 26378589 PMC: 4588150. DOI: 10.3390/biology4030556.


Smart surface for elution of protein-protein bound particles: nanonewton dielectrophoretic forces using atomic layer deposited oxides.

Emaminejad S, Javanmard M, Dutton R, Davis R Anal Chem. 2012; 84(24):10793-801.

PMID: 23176521 PMC: 4984534. DOI: 10.1021/ac302857z.


Was the Scanner Calibration Slide used for its intended purpose?.

Zhang S, Zong Y BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12:110.

PMID: 21510874 PMC: 3096983. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-110.


References
1.
Bengtsson H, Jonsson G, Vallon-Christersson J . Calibration and assessment of channel-specific biases in microarray data with extended dynamical range. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004; 5:177. PMC: 539274. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-177. View

2.
Choquette S, Etz E, Hurst W, Blackburn D, Leigh S . Relative intensity correction of Raman spectrometers: NIST SRMs 2241 through 2243 for 785 nm, 532 nm, and 488 nm/514.5 nm excitation. Appl Spectrosc. 2007; 61(2):117-29. DOI: 10.1366/000370207779947585. View

3.
Shi L, Reid L, Jones W, Shippy R, Warrington J, Baker S . The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol. 2006; 24(9):1151-61. PMC: 3272078. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1239. View

4.
Shi L, Tong W, Su Z, Han T, Han J, Puri R . Microarray scanner calibration curves: characteristics and implications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6 Suppl 2:S11. PMC: 1637029. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S2-S11. View

5.
Lyng H, Badiee A, Svendsrud D, Hovig E, Myklebost O, Stokke T . Profound influence of microarray scanner characteristics on gene expression ratios: analysis and procedure for correction. BMC Genomics. 2004; 5(1):10. PMC: 356910. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-5-10. View