Profound Influence of Microarray Scanner Characteristics on Gene Expression Ratios: Analysis and Procedure for Correction

Overview

Journal BMC Genomics

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Genetics

Date 2004 Mar 17

PMID 15018648

Citations 34

Authors

Heidi Lyng

Azadeh Badiee

Debbie H Svendsrud

Eivind Hovig

Ola Myklebost

Trond Stokke

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: High throughput gene expression data from spotted cDNA microarrays are collected by scanning the signal intensities of the corresponding spots by dedicated fluorescence scanners. The major scanner settings for increasing the spot intensities are the laser power and the voltage of the photomultiplier tube (PMT). It is required that the expression ratios are independent of these settings. We have investigated the relationships between PMT voltage, spot intensities, and expression ratios for different scanners, in order to define an optimal scanning procedure.

Results: All scanners showed a limited intensity range from 200 to 50 000 (mean spot intensity), for which the expression ratios were independent of PMT voltage. This usable intensity range was considerably less than the maximum detection range of the PMTs. The use of spot and background intensities outside this range led to errors in the ratios. The errors at high intensities were caused by saturation of pixel intensities within the spots. An algorithm was developed to correct the intensities of these spots, and, hence, extend the upper limit of the usable intensity range.

Conclusions: It is suggested that the PMT voltage should be increased to avoid intensities of the weakest spots below the usable range, allowing the brightest spots to reach the level of saturation. Subsequently, a second set of images should be acquired with a lower PMT setting such that no pixels are in saturation. Reliable data for spots with saturation in the first set of images can easily be extracted from the second set of images by the use of our algorithm. This procedure would lead to an increase in the accuracy of the data and in the number of data points achieved in each experiment compared to traditional procedures.

Citing Articles

The common variable immunodeficiency IgM repertoire narrowly recognizes erythrocyte and platelet glycans.

Le Coz C, Trofa M, Butler D, Yoon S, Tian T, Reid W J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024; 154(3):778-791.e9.

PMID: 38692308 PMC: 11380600. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.04.018.

Abnormal antibodies to self-carbohydrates in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.

Butler D, Imberti L, Quaresima V, Fiorini C, Gildersleeve J PNAS Nexus. 2022; 1(3):pgac062.

PMID: 35865361 PMC: 9291223. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac062.

Array Analysis Manager-An automated DNA microarray analysis tool simplifying microarray data filtering, bias recognition, normalization, and expression analysis.

von der Haar M, Lindner P, Scheper T, Stahl F Eng Life Sci. 2020; 17(8):841-846.

PMID: 32624831 PMC: 6999572. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201700046.

Optimization of Cyanine Dye Stability and Analysis of FRET Interaction on DNA Microarrays.

von der Haar M, Heuer C, Pahler M, von der Haar K, Lindner P, Scheper T Biology (Basel). 2016; 5(4).

PMID: 27916881 PMC: 5192427. DOI: 10.3390/biology5040047.

Aptamer Microarrays-Current Status and Future Prospects.

Witt M, Walter J, Stahl F Microarrays (Basel). 2016; 4(2):115-32.

PMID: 27600216 PMC: 4996391. DOI: 10.3390/microarrays4020115.

References

Dudley A, Aach J, Steffen M, Church G . Measuring absolute expression with microarrays with a calibrated reference sample and an extended signal intensity range. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(11):7554-9. PMC: 124281. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.112683499. View

Hsiao L, Jensen R, Yoshida T, Clark K, Blumenstock J, Gullans S . Correcting for signal saturation errors in the analysis of microarray data. Biotechniques. 2002; 32(2):330-2, 334, 336. DOI: 10.2144/02322st06. View

Kepler T, Crosby L, Morgan K . Normalization and analysis of DNA microarray data by self-consistency and local regression. Genome Biol. 2002; 3(7):RESEARCH0037. PMC: 126242. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0037. View

Saal L, Troein C, Vallon-Christersson J, Gruvberger S, Borg A, Peterson C . BioArray Software Environment (BASE): a platform for comprehensive management and analysis of microarray data. Genome Biol. 2002; 3(8):SOFTWARE0003. PMC: 139402. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-8-software0003. View

Workman C, Jensen L, Jarmer H, Berka R, Gautier L, Nielser H . A new non-linear normalization method for reducing variability in DNA microarray experiments. Genome Biol. 2002; 3(9):research0048. PMC: 126873. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-9-research0048. View

Quackenbush J . Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nat Genet. 2002; 32 Suppl:496-501. DOI: 10.1038/ng1032. View

Smyth G, Yang Y, Speed T . Statistical issues in cDNA microarray data analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 2003; 224:111-36. DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-364-X:111. View

Brown P, Botstein D . Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 1999; 21(1 Suppl):33-7. DOI: 10.1038/4462. View

Schuchhardt J, Beule D, Malik A, Wolski E, EICKHOFF H, Lehrach H . Normalization strategies for cDNA microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28(10):E47. PMC: 105386. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.10.e47. View

10.

Young R . Biomedical discovery with DNA arrays. Cell. 2000; 102(1):9-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00005-2. View

11.

Lee M, Kuo F, Whitmore G, Sklar J . Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(18):9834-9. PMC: 27599. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.18.9834. View

12.

Wildsmith S, Archer G, Winkley A, Lane P, Bugelski P . Maximization of signal derived from cDNA microarrays. Biotechniques. 2001; 30(1):202-6, 208. DOI: 10.2144/01301dd04. View

13.

Deyholos M, Galbraith D . High-density microarrays for gene expression analysis. Cytometry. 2001; 43(4):229-38. View

14.

Yue H, Eastman P, Wang B, Minor J, Doctolero M, Nuttall R . An evaluation of the performance of cDNA microarrays for detecting changes in global mRNA expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(8):E41-1. PMC: 31325. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.8.e41. View

15.

Wang X, Ghosh S, Guo S . Quantitative quality control in microarray image processing and data acquisition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(15):E75-5. PMC: 55840. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.15.e75. View

16.

Zhang W, Laborde P, Coombes K, Berry D, Hamilton S . Cancer genomics: promises and complexities. Clin Cancer Res. 2001; 7(8):2159-67. View

17.

Yang Y, Buckley M, Speed T . Analysis of cDNA microarray images. Brief Bioinform. 2002; 2(4):341-9. DOI: 10.1093/bib/2.4.341. View

18.

Yang Y, Dudoit S, Luu P, Lin D, Peng V, Ngai J . Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30(4):e15. PMC: 100354. DOI: 10.1093/nar/30.4.e15. View

19.

Lage J, Hamann S, Gribanov O, Leamon J, Pejovic T, Lizardi P . Microgel assessment of nucleic acid integrity and labeling quality in microarray experiments. Biotechniques. 2002; 32(2):312-4. DOI: 10.2144/02322bm07. View

20.

Jenssen T, Langaas M, Kuo W, Smith-Sorensen B, Myklebost O, Hovig E . Analysis of repeatability in spotted cDNA microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30(14):3235-44. PMC: 135761. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkf441. View