» Articles » PMID: 27050911

Should Studies of Diabetes Treatment Stratification Correct for Baseline HbA1c?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Apr 7
PMID 27050911
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Baseline HbA1c is a major predictor of response to glucose lowering therapy and therefore a potential confounder in studies aiming to identify other predictors. However, baseline adjustment may introduce error if the association between baseline HbA1c and response is substantially due to measurement error and regression to the mean. We aimed to determine whether studies of predictors of response should adjust for baseline HbA1c.

Methods: We assessed the relationship between baseline HbA1c and glycaemic response in 257 participants treated with GLP-1R agonists and assessed whether it reflected measurement error and regression to the mean using duplicate 'pre-baseline' HbA1c measurements not included in the response variable. In this cohort and an additional 2659 participants treated with sulfonylureas we assessed the relationship between covariates associated with baseline HbA1c and treatment response with and without baseline adjustment, and with a bias correction using pre-baseline HbA1c to adjust for the effects of error in baseline HbA1c.

Results: Baseline HbA1c was a major predictor of response (R2 = 0.19,β = -0.44,p<0.001).The association between pre-baseline and response was similar suggesting the greater response at higher baseline HbA1cs is not mainly due to measurement error and subsequent regression to the mean. In unadjusted analysis in both cohorts, factors associated with baseline HbA1c were associated with response, however these associations were weak or absent after adjustment for baseline HbA1c. Bias correction did not substantially alter associations.

Conclusions: Adjustment for the baseline HbA1c measurement is a simple and effective way to reduce bias in studies of predictors of response to glucose lowering therapy.

Citing Articles

Glycemic control after aortic valve replacement: A retrospective study.

Avidan Y, Aker A, Naoum I, Stein N, Kassem S Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025; 56():101596.

PMID: 39850779 PMC: 11754825. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101596.


Baseline-dependent improvement in CF studies, plausibility of bias.

Graham E, Heltshe S, Magaret A Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024; 42:101378.

PMID: 39678155 PMC: 11639362. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101378.


Association of Baseline Factors With Glycemic Outcomes in GRADE: A Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial.

Garvey W, Cohen R, Butera N, Kazemi E, Younes N, Rosin S Diabetes Care. 2024; 47(4):562-570.

PMID: 38285957 PMC: 10973909. DOI: 10.2337/dc23-1782.


A study of factors influencing long-term glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes: a structural equation modeling approach.

Gan Y, Chen M, Kong L, Wu J, Pu Y, Wang X Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1216897.

PMID: 37588983 PMC: 10425538. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1216897.


Time for Using Machine Learning for Dose Guidance in Titration of People With Type 2 Diabetes? A Systematic Review of Basal Insulin Dose Guidance.

Thomsen C, Hangaard S, Kronborg T, Vestergaard P, Hejlesen O, Jensen M J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022; 18(5):1185-1197.

PMID: 36562599 PMC: 11418255. DOI: 10.1177/19322968221145964.


References
1.
Bloomgarden Z, Dodis R, Viscoli C, Holmboe E, Inzucchi S . Lower baseline glycemia reduces apparent oral agent glucose-lowering efficacy: a meta-regression analysis. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29(9):2137-9. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1120. View

2.
Thong K, McDonald T, Hattersley A, Blann A, Ramtoola S, Duncan C . The association between postprandial urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio and the treatment response to liraglutide: a multi-centre observational study. Diabet Med. 2013; 31(4):403-11. DOI: 10.1111/dme.12367. View

3.
Pearson E, Starkey B, Powell R, Gribble F, Clark P, Hattersley A . Genetic cause of hyperglycaemia and response to treatment in diabetes. Lancet. 2003; 362(9392):1275-81. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14571-0. View

4.
Pearson E, Flechtner I, Njolstad P, Malecki M, Flanagan S, Larkin B . Switching from insulin to oral sulfonylureas in patients with diabetes due to Kir6.2 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(5):467-77. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa061759. View

5.
t Hart L, Fritsche A, Nijpels G, van Leeuwen N, Donnelly L, Dekker J . The CTRB1/2 locus affects diabetes susceptibility and treatment via the incretin pathway. Diabetes. 2013; 62(9):3275-81. PMC: 3749354. DOI: 10.2337/db13-0227. View