Aim:
To evaluate the impact of relevant patient-level characteristics on the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous, once-weekly semaglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
Materials And Methods:
Exploratory post hoc analyses of pooled SUSTAIN 1-5 (phase 3a) randomized, controlled trials examined the change from baseline in HbA1c and body weight (BW), and the proportions of subjects achieving the composite endpoint (HbA1c < 7.0% [53 mmol/mol]), without weight gain or severe/blood glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia at week 30 with semaglutide (0.5/1.0 mg) across clinically relevant patient subgroups: baseline HbA1c (≤7.5%, >7.5%-8.0%, >8.0%-8.5%, >8.5%-9.0% and > 9.0%), background medications, diabetes duration and pancreatic beta-cell function.
Results:
Mean HbA1c (% point) reductions increased from lowest to highest HbA1c subgroups (-0.9%, -1.2%,-1.5%, -1.7% and -2.3% [effect of subgroup within treatment: P = 0.247] for semaglutide 0.5 mg, and -1.1%, -1.4%, -1.9%, -2.1% and -2.7% [P = 0.045] for semaglutide 1.0 mg), with mean HbA1c ranges at week 30 of 6.3%-7.3% and 6.1%-6.9%, respectively. The corresponding BW reductions generally decreased with increasing baseline HbA1c (-4.4, -3.9, -3.9, -3.3 and -2.9 kg [P = 0.004], and -6.4, -5.9, -5.2, -4.5 and -4.8 kg [P < 0.001], respectively). HbA1c and BW reductions were consistently greater for semaglutide 1.0 mg versus 0.5 mg across background medication, diabetes duration and pancreatic beta-cell function subgroups. Adverse events with semaglutide were consistent with the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist class, with gastrointestinal events the most common.
Conclusions:
Semaglutide was consistently efficacious across the continuum of diabetes care in a broad spectrum of patient subgroups with a range of clinical characteristics.
Citing Articles
Subcutaneous weekly semaglutide with automated insulin delivery in type 1 diabetes: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial.
Pasqua M, Tsoukas M, Kobayati A, Aboznadah W, Jafar A, Haidar A
Nat Med. 2025; .
PMID: 39794615
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03463-z.
Post Hoc Analysis of SURPASS-1 to -5: Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes are Independent of Baseline Characteristics.
De Block C, Peleshok J, Wilding J, Kwan A, Rasouli N, Maldonado J
Diabetes Ther. 2024; 16(1):43-71.
PMID: 39531161
PMC: 11759727.
DOI: 10.1007/s13300-024-01660-0.
Tirzepatide Improved Markers of Islet Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity in People With T2D (SURPASS-2).
Frias J, De Block C, Brown K, Wang H, Thomas M, Zeytinoglu M
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024; 109(7):1745-1753.
PMID: 38252888
PMC: 11180500.
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgae038.
The efficacy and safety of beinaglutide alone or in combination with insulin glargine in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycemic therapy: A multicenter, open-label, randomized trial.
Liu X, Yang W, Liu J, Huang X, Fang Y, Ming J
J Diabetes. 2023; .
PMID: 37864379
PMC: 10850920.
DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.13483.
Effect of Semaglutide on Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiometabolic Compensation: A Real-World Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Patti A, Giglio R, Allotta A, Bruno A, Di Bella T, Pantea Stoian A
Biomedicines. 2023; 11(5).
PMID: 37239033
PMC: 10216597.
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11051362.
Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Duration on the Efficacy and Safety of Add-on Lixisenatide in Asian Individuals Receiving Basal Insulin: A Pooled Analysis.
Yao J, Zhang M, Zhang X, Zhang J
Diabetes Ther. 2023; 14(4):653-669.
PMID: 36809495
PMC: 10064411.
DOI: 10.1007/s13300-023-01369-6.
C-peptide determination in the diagnosis of type of diabetes and its management: A clinical perspective.
Maddaloni E, Bolli G, Frier B, Little R, Leslie R, Pozzilli P
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022; 24(10):1912-1926.
PMID: 35676794
PMC: 9543865.
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14785.
Real-world evaluation of weekly subcutaneous treatment with semaglutide in a cohort of Italian diabetic patients.
Marzullo P, Daffara T, Mele C, Zavattaro M, Ferrero A, Caputo M
J Endocrinol Invest. 2022; 45(8):1587-1598.
PMID: 35429298
PMC: 9270295.
DOI: 10.1007/s40618-022-01799-2.
Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide by subgroups of patient characteristics in the PIONEER phase 3 programme.
Aroda V, Bauer R, Christiansen E, Haluzik M, Kallenbach K, Montanya E
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022; 24(7):1338-1350.
PMID: 35373893
PMC: 9321749.
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14710.
Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis by baseline variables in the PIONEER 9 and PIONEER 10 trials.
Yabe D, Deenadayalan S, Horio H, Kaneto H, Jensen T, Terauchi Y
J Diabetes Investig. 2022; 13(6):975-985.
PMID: 35112504
PMC: 9153832.
DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13764.
Effect of dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg on weight in patients with type 2 diabetes: Exploratory analyses of AWARD-11.
Bonora E, Frias J, Tinahones F, Van J, Malik R, Yu Z
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021; 23(10):2242-2250.
PMID: 34189841
PMC: 8518850.
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14465.
Efficacy of liraglutide added to sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes, stratified by baseline characteristics: Post-hoc analysis of LIRA-ADD2SGLT2i.
Blonde L, Fainberg U, Kaltoft M, Mosenzon O, Ramesh C, Rea R
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021; 23(10):2234-2241.
PMID: 34132018
PMC: 8518913.
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14464.
Impact of baseline characteristics and beta-cell function on the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous once-weekly semaglutide: A patient-level, pooled analysis of the SUSTAIN 1-5 trials.
Aroda V, Capehorn M, Chaykin L, Frias J, Lausvig N, Macura S
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019; 22(3):303-314.
PMID: 31608552
PMC: 7065219.
DOI: 10.1111/dom.13896.